화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.27, No.1, 355-363, January, 2010
Numerical and experimental investigation of a fluidized bed chamber hydrodynamics with heat transfer
E-mail:
The hydrodynamics and heat transfer of a gas-solid fluidized bed chamber was investigated by computational fluid dynamic (CFD) techniques. A multifluid Eulerian model incorporating the kinetic theory for solid particles was applied to simulate the unsteady state behavior of this chamber. For momentum exchange coefficients, Syamlal-O’Brien drag functions were used. A suitable numerical method that employed finite volume method was applied to discretize the equations. The simulation results also indicated that small bubbles were produced at the bottom of the bed. These bubbles collided with each other as they moved upwards forming larger bubbles. Also, the solid particle temperature effect on heat transfer and hydrodynamics was studied. Simulation results were compared with the experimental data in order to validate the CFD model. Pressure drops and mean gas temperature predicted by the simulations at different positions in the chamber were in good agreement with experimental measurements at gas velocities higher than the minimum fluidization velocity. Furthermore, this comparison showed that the model could predict hydrodynamics and heat transfer behaviors of gas solid fluidized bed reasonably well.
  1. Kunii D, Levenspiel O, Fluidization engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann Publications, Boston (1991)
  2. Gidaspow D, Multiphase flow and fluidization, Academic Press, London (1994)
  3. Ranade VV, Computational flow modeling for chemical reactor engineering, Academic Press, New York (2002)
  4. Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN, Transport phenomena, Wiley Publications, New York (2002)
  5. Grace JR, Taghipour F, Powder Technol., 139(2), 99 (2004)
  6. Taghipour F, Ellis N, Wong C, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(24), 6857 (2005)
  7. Goldschmidt MJV, Kuipers JAM, van Swaaij WPM, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(2), 571 (2001)
  8. Kaneko Y, Shiojima T, Horio M, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(24), 5809 (1999)
  9. Behjat Y, Shahhosseini S, Hashemabadi SH, Int. Commun. Heat. Mass., 35, 357 (2008)
  10. Lu HL, He YR, Gidaspow D, Chem. Eng. Sci., 58(7), 1197 (2003)
  11. Gobin H, Neau O, Simonin J, Llinas V, Reiling JL, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fl., 43, 1199 (2003)
  12. Lettieri P, Saccone G, Cammarata L, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 82(8), 939 (2004)
  13. Chiesa M, Mathiesen V, Melheim JA, Halvorsen B, Comput. Chem. Eng., 29(2), 291 (2005)
  14. van Wachem BGM, Schouten JC, Krishna R, van den Bleek CM, Comput. Chem. Eng., 22(S), 299 (1998)
  15. Fan R, Fox RO, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63(1), 272 (2008)
  16. Mansoori Z, Saffar-Avval M, Tabrizi HB, Ahmadi G, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 45(6), 1173 (2002)
  17. Syamlal M, O’Brien TJ, AIChE J., 85, 22 (1989)
  18. Syamlal M, O'Brien TJ, AIChE J., 49(11), 2793 (2003)
  19. Gamwo IK, Soong Y, Lyczkowski RW, Powder Technol., 103(2), 117 (1999)
  20. Lun CKK, Savage SBA, J. Appl. Mech., 54, 47 (1987)
  21. Hui K, Haff PK, Jackson R, J. Fluid. Mech., 145, 223 (1984)
  22. Johnson PC, Jackson R, J. Fluid. Mech., 176, 67 (1987)
  23. Patankar SV, Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow, Hemisphere Publications, Washington DC (1980)
  24. Hamzehei M, Rahimzadeh T, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(6), 3177 (2009)