화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.13, No.5, 815-826, September, 2007
Comparison of the Performance of a Fixed Bed Reactor in the Two Cases, Mixture of Catalyst Pellets and a Hybrid Catalyst, for Dimetyl Ether Synthesis
E-mail:
Dimethyl Ether (DME, CH3OCH3) is the simplest ether and considered as one of the leading candidates for the substitute of petroleum-based fuels. In this work, we analyzed one-step DME synthesis in a shell and rube type fixed bed reactor and carried out simulation with a one-dimensional, steady state model of heterogeneous catalyst bed with consideration of the heat and mass transfer between catalyst pellet and reactants gas and effectiveness factor of catalysts together with reactor cooling through reactor tube wall. We compared behaviours of the reactor using two different arrangements of catalysts, mixture of catalyst pellets and hybrid catalyst. The effects of several parameters including feed temperature, GHSV (Gas Hourly Space Velocity), H2 to CO ratio in the feed gas, reactor pressure and ratio of methanol synthesis catalyst to methanol dehydration catalyst were investigated. Results of the simulation indicate that hybrid catalyst is better than mixture of pellets in terms of CO conversion, DME yield and DME productivity due to proximity of active sites of two different catalysts.
  1. Semelsberger TA, Borup RL, Greene HL, J. Power Sources, 156(2), 497 (2006)
  2. Alam M, Fujita O, Ito K, J. Power Energy, 218, 89 (2004)
  3. Sorenson SC, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power-Trans, 123, 652 (2001)
  4. Rouhi AM, Chem. Eng., News., 73, 37 (1995)
  5. Fleisch TH, Basu A, Gradassi MJ, Masin JG, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 107, 117 (1997)
  6. Kaiser EW, Wailington TJ, Hurley MD, Platz J, Curran HJ, Pitz WJ, Westbrook CK, J. Phys. Chem. A, 104(35), 8194 (2000)
  7. Song J, Huang Z, Qiao XQ, Wang WL, Energy Conv. Manag., 45(13-14), 2223 (2004)
  8. Wang HW, Zhou LB, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D: J. Automobile Eng., 217, 819 (2003)
  9. Zannis TC, Hountalas DT, Energy Fuels, 18(3), 659 (2004)
  10. Peng XD, Wang AW, Toseland BA, Tijm PJA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38, 4381 (1999)
  11. Sun KP, Lu WW, Qiu FY, Liu SW, Xu XL, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 252(2), 243 (2003)
  12. Omata K, Watanabe Y, Umegaki T, Ishiguro G, Yamada M, Fuel, 81, 1605 (2002)
  13. Lu WZ, Teng LH, Xiao WD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59(22-23), 5455 (2004)
  14. Ohno Y, Inoue N, Ogawa T, Ono M, Shikada T, Hayashi H, NKK Technical Review No. 85 (2001)
  15. Ng KL, Chadwick D, Toseland BA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(15-16), 3587 (1999)
  16. Vandenbussche KM, Froment GF, J. Catal., 161(1), 1 (1996)
  17. Bercic G, Levec J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, 1035 (1992)
  18. Twigg MV, Catalyst Handbook, 2nd Edn. Wolfe, London (1986)
  19. Stull DR, westrum EF, Sinke GC, The Chemical Thermodynamics of Organic Compounds, John Wiley, New York (1969)
  20. Kunii D, Levenspiel O, Fluidization Engineering, 2nd Edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston (1990)
  21. Welty JR, Wicks CE, Wilson RE, Fundamentals of momentum, heat and mass transfer, 3rd Edn. Wiley, New York (1976)
  22. Cengel, Heat transfer a practical approach, McGraw-Hill, Boston (1998)
  23. Satterfield CN, Mass Transfer in Heterogeneous Catalysis, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (1970)
  24. McCabe WL, Smith JC, Harriott P, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 5th Edn. McGrawHill, New York (1995)
  25. Riggs JM, An introduction to numerical methods for chemical engineers, Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock (1994)
  26. Stachurski ZH, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 6, 773 (2005)