화학공학소재연구정보센터
Clean Technology, Vol.26, No.4, 279-285, December, 2020
The Measurement of Flash Point for Binary Mixtures of 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane, Methylcyclohexane, Ethylbenzene and p-xylene at 101.3 kPa
E-mail:
Laboratories and industrial processes typically involve the use of flammable substances. An important property used to estimate fire and explosion risk for a flammable liquid is the flash point. In this study, flash point data at 101.3 kPa were determined using a SETA closed cup flash point tester on the following solvent mixtures: {2,2,4-trimethylpentane + methylcyclohexane}, {2,2,4-trimethylpentane + ethylbenzene}, and {2,2,4-trimethylpentane + p-xylene}. The purpose of this work is to obtain flash point data for binary mixtures of 2,2,4-trimethylpentane with three hydrocarbons (methylcyclohexane, ethylbenzene, and p-xylene), which are representative compounds of the main aromatic hydrocarbon fractions of petroleum. The measured flash points are compared with the predicted values calculated using the GE models’ activity coefficient patterns: the Wilson, the Non-Random Two-Liquid (NRTL), and the UNIversal QUAsiChemical (UNIQUAC) models. The non-ideality of the mixture is also considered. The average absolute deviation between the predicted and measured lower flash point s is less than 1.99 K, except when Raoult’s law is calculated. In addition, the minimum flash point behavior is not observed in any of the three binary systems. This work’s predicted results can be applied to design safe petrochemical processes, such as identifying safe storage conditions for non-ideal solutions containing volatile components.
  1. Liaw HJ, Gerbaud V, Wu HT, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55(9), 3451 (2010)
  2. Liaw HJ, Chiu YY, J. Hazard. Mater., 137(1), 38 (2006)
  3. Lees FP, Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2nd ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, U.K. (1996).
  4. Poor HM, Sadrameli SM, Fluid Phase Equilib., 440, 95 (2017)
  5. da Cunha S, Liaw HJ, Gerbaud V, Fluid Phase Equilib., 452, 113 (2017)
  6. Liaw HJ, Lee YH, Tang CL, Hsu HH, Liu JH, J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind., 15, 429 (2018)
  7. Fishbein L, Chemicals Used in the Rubber Industry, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 45-95 (1990).
  8. Manuel HJ, Dierkes W, Recycling of Rubber: Review Reports, Rapra Technology, Akron, Ohio, Report No. 99 (1999).
  9. Beauregard D, United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA: Research Triangle Park (1994).
  10. Vora BA, Kocal JA, Barger PT, Schmidt RJ, Johnson JA, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2003).
  11. Wilson GM, Deal CH, Ind. Chem. Fundam, 1(1), 20 (1962)
  12. Renon H, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 14(1), 135 (1968)
  13. Abrams DS, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 21(1), 116 (1975)
  14. National Fire Protection Association, Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA. National Fire Codes, 7 (1985).
  15. Dortmund Data Bank Software Package (DDBSP), version 2006 professional, Software and Separation Technology GmbH. (http://www.ddbst.de).
  16. American Society for Testing Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 6 (1999).
  17. In SJ, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 32, 327 (2015)
  18. Hwang IC, Kim SW, In SJ, Fire Sci. Eng., 32(1), 1 (2018)
  19. Hwang IC, In SJ, Clean Technol., 25(2), 140 (2019)
  20. Le Chatelier H, Ann Mines, 19(8), 388 (1891)
  21. Liaw HJ, Tang CL, Lai JS, Combust. Flame, 138(4), 308 (2004)
  22. Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O’connell JP, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York City, U. S. (2001).
  23. White D, Beyler CL, Fulper C, Leonard J, Fire Saf. J., 28(1), 1 (1997)
  24. Segura H, Reich R, Galindo G, Wisniak J, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 44(5), 912 (1999)
  25. Martins VD, Granato MA, Rodrigues AE, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 59(5), 1499 (2014)