화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.54, 377-388, October, 2017
DOI10.1016/j.jiec.2017.06.018  Export Citation
Ultrasound-assisted binary adsorption of dyes onto Mn@ CuS/ZnS-NC-AC as a novel adsorbent: Application of chemometrics for optimization and modeling
Arash Asfaram1, Mehrorang Ghaedi1, †, Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi Azqhandi2, Alireza Goudarzi3, and Shaaker Hajati4, 5
  • 1Chemistry Department, Yasouj University, Yasouj 75918-74831, Iran
  • 2Applied Chemistry Department, Faculty of Petroleum and Gas (Gachsaran), Yasouj University, Gachsaran 75813-56001, Iran
  • 3Department of Polymer Engineering, Golestan University, Gorgan 49188-88369, Iran
  • 4Department of Physics, Yasouj University, Yasouj 75918-74831, Iran
  • 5Department of Semiconductors, Materials and Energy Research Center (MERC), Karaj 3177983634, Iran
E-mail:
Response surface methodology (RSM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN) were applied to model and predict the efficiency of two carcinogenic dyes (Methylene blue (MB) and Malachite green (MG)) adsorption onto Mn@ CuS/ZnS nanocomposite-loaded activated carbon (Mn@ CuS/ZnS-NC-AC) as a novel adsorbent. The properties of Mn@ CuS/ZnS-NC-AC were identified by XRD; FE-SEM and EDS. The parameters such as pH, Mn@ CuS/ZnS-NC-AC mass, sonication time, MB concentration and MG concentration involved in the adsorption process were set within the ranges 4.0-8.0, 0.010-0.030 g, 1-5 min, 5-25 mg L-1 and 5-25 mg L-1, respectively. The applicability of the RBFNN, ANN and RSM models for the description of experimental data was examined using four statistical criteria (coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and absolute average deviation (AAD)). Compared to RSM, the RBFNN and ANN exhibited better performance for modeling the process of both dyes adsorption. The significant factors were evaluated followed by the optimization of the process. The adsorption of MB and MG was found to be mostly affected by the concentration of MB and MG dyes. The equilibrium adsorption data were analyzed by Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin.Radushkevich isotherm models. The best fit to the data was obtained by applying the Langmuir model. Meanwhile, the maximum adsorption capacity for MB and MG was estimated to be 126.42 and 115.08 mg g-1, respectively.
Keywords:Adsorption;Methylene blue;Malachite green;Response surface methodology;Radial Basis Function Neural Networks
  1. Chen BY, Process Biochem., 38(3), 437 (2002)
  2. Kurniawan A, Sutiono H, Indraswati N, Ismadji S, Chem. Eng. J., 189, 264 (2012)
  3. Gupta VK, Sharma G, Pathania D, Kothiyal NC, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 957 (2015)
  4. Hemmateenejad B, Shadabipour P, Khosousi T, Shamsipur M, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 27, 384 (2015)
  5. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Goudarzi A, Ultrason. Sonochem., 32, 418 (2016)
  6. Malekbala MR, Khan MA, Hosseini S, Abdullah LC, Choong TSY, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 21, 369 (2015)
  7. Kushwaha AK, Gupta N, Chattopadhyaya MC, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 18, 200 (2014)
  8. Jain AK, Gupta VK, Bhatnagar A, Suhas, J. Hazard. Mater., 101(1), 31 (2003)
  9. Hwang KJ, Shim WG, Kim Y, Kim G, Choi C, Kang SO, Cho DW, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 21974 (2015)
  10. Rahman MA, Amin SR, Alam AS, Dhaka Univ. J. Sci., 60, 185 (2012)
  11. Mansouri J, Harrisson S, Chen V, J. Mater. Chem., 20, 4567 (2010)
  12. Azad FN, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Jamshidi A, Hassani G, Goudarzi A, Azqhandi MHA, Ghaedi A, RSC Adv., 6, 19768 (2016)
  13. Ummartyotin S, Bunnak N, Juntaro J, Sain M, Manuspiya H, Solid State Sci., 14, 299 (2012)
  14. Lu L, Li J, Yu J, Song P, Ng DHL, Chem. Eng. J., 283, 524 (2016)
  15. Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Barazesh B, Karimi F, Ghezelbash G, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 19(1), 227 (2013)
  16. Dil EA, Ghaedi M, Ghaedi AM, Asfaram A, Goudarzi A, Hajati S, Soylak M, Agarwal S, Gupta VK, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 34, 186 (2016)
  17. Vargas AMM, Martins AC, Almeida VC, Chem. Eng. J., 195, 173 (2012)
  18. Ghaedi M, Hajjati S, Mahmudi Z, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Maity A, Gupta VK, Chem. Eng. J., 268, 28 (2015)
  19. Bagheri AR, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Hajati S, Ghaedi AM, Bazrafshan A, Rahimi MR, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 65, 212 (2016)
  20. Bagheri AR, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Jannesar R, Goudarzi A, Ultrason. Sonochem., 35, 112 (2017)
  21. Gao JF, Wang JH, Yang C, Wang SY, Peng YZ, Chem. Eng. J., 171(3), 967 (2011)
  22. Khanmohammadi M, Azghandi MA, Anal. Chem. Lett., 1, 202 (2011)
  23. Askari H, Ghaedi M, Dashtian K, Azghandi MHA, Ultrason. Sonochem., 37, 71 (2017)
  24. Liu P, Zhou X, Li Y, Li M, Yu D, Liu J, Anal. Methods, 5, 4454 (2013)
  25. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Yousefi F, Dastkhoon M, Ultrason. Sonochem., 33, 77 (2016)
  26. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Azqhandi MHA, Goudarzi A, Dastkhoon M, RSC Adv., 6, 40502 (2016)
  27. Balabin RM, Lomakina EI, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 11710 (2011)
  28. Vlachogianni A, Kassomenos P, Karppinen A, Karakitsios S, Kukkonen J, Sci. Total Environ., 409, 1559 (2011)
  29. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Goudarzi A, RSC Adv., 5, 72300 (2015)
  30. Ghaedi M, Dashtian K, Ghaedi AM, Dehghanian N, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 18, 13310 (2016)
  31. Ko CN, Lee CM, Energy, 49, 413 (2013)
  32. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Goudarzi A, Bazrafshan AA, Spectroc. Acta Pt. A-Molec. Biomolec. Spectr., 145, 203 (2015)
  33. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Goudarzi A, Dil EA, Ultrason. Sonochem., 34, 1 (2017)
  34. Dil EA, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Ultrason. Sonochem., 34, 792 (2017)
  35. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Agarwal S, Tyagi I, Gupta VK, RSC Adv., 5, 18438 (2015)
  36. Darwish HW, Hassan SA, Salem MY, El-Zeany BA, Spectroc. Acta Pt. A-Molec. Biomolec. Spectr., 122, 744 (2014)
  37. Azghandi MHA, Khanmohammadi MR, Green Chem., 5, 415 (2012)
  38. Bonanno F, Capizzi G, Graditi G, Napoli C, Tina GM, Appl. Energy, 97, 956 (2012)
  39. Dayhoff JE, DeLeo JM, Cancer, 91, 1615 (2001)
  40. Ghaedi M, Naghiha R, Jannesar R, dehghanian N, Mirtamizdoust B, pezeshkpour V, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 32, 353 (2015)
  41. Sarve A, Sonawane SS, Varma MN, Ultrason. Sonochem., 26, 218 (2015)
  42. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Goudarzi A, Rajabi M, Dalton Trans., 44, 14707 (2015)
  43. Ansari F, Ghaedi M, Taghdiri M, Asfaram A, Ultrason. Sonochem., 33, 197 (2016)
  44. Mazaheri H, Ghaedi M, Asfaram A, Hajati S, J. Mol. Liq., 219, 667 (2016)
  45. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Rezaeinejad M, Goudarzi A, Purkait MK, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 53, 80 (2015)
  46. Wu Y, Liu B, Li M, Tang K, Wu Y, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 31, 1564 (2013)
  47. Simon D, Neurocomputing, 48, 455 (2002)
  48. Lee SC, Lin HT, Yang TY, Environ. Monit. Assess., 161, 315 (2010)
  49. Khajeh M, Sarafraz-Yazdi A, Natavan ZB, Toxicol. Ind. Health, 32, 437 (2016)
  50. Dragoi EN, Suditu GD, Curteanu S, Environ. Eng. Manag. J., 11, 1907 (2012)
  51. Khajeh M, Dastafkan K, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(5), 3014 (2014)
  52. Garson DG, Bibliometrics, 6, 47 (1991)
  53. Kiransan M, Khataee A, Karaca S, Sheydaei M, Spectroc. Acta Pt. A-Molec. Biomolec. Spectr., 140, 465 (2015)
  54. Khataee AR, Kasiri MB, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 331(1-2), 86 (2010)
  55. Langmuir I, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 40, 1361 (1918)
  56. Freundlich H, J. Phys. Chem., 57, 110 (1906)
  57. Temkin M, Pyzhev V, Acta Phys. Chim. Sinica, 12, 217 (1940)
  58. Dubinin M, Serpinsky V, Carbon, 19, 402 (1981)
  59. Kaur S, Rani S, Mahajan RK, Asif M, Gupta VK, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 22, 19 (2015)
  60. Ai LH, Zhang CY, Liao F, Wang Y, Li M, Meng LY, Jiang J, J. Hazard. Mater., 198, 282 (2011)
  61. Wang T, Kailasam K, Xiao P, Chen G, Chen L, Wang L, Li J, Zhu J, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 187, 63 (2014)
  62. Issa AA, Al-Degs YS, Al-Ghouti MA, Olimat AAM, Chem. Eng. J., 240, 554 (2014)
  63. Peng Q, Liu M, Zheng J, Zhou C, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 201, 190 (2015)
  64. Kant S, Pathania D, Singh P, Dhiman P, Kumar A, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 147, 340 (2014)
  65. Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Zare M, Zare M, Jaberi SYS, RSC Adv., 5, 38939 (2015)