화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.20, No.5, 3134-3140, September, 2014
Effects of polyaniline nanoparticles in polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes: Fouling behaviours by different types of foulant
E-mail:
Polyethersulfone (PES) was modified by blending it with polyaniline (PANI) nanoparticles to improve the membrane performance. Three types of membranes: PES (controlled sample), PES-PANI selfsynthesised, and PES-PANI (commercial), were evaluated by direct interaction with BSA, humic acid, silica nanoparticles, Escherichia coli and Bacillus bacteria. The surface hydrophilicity of the modified PES membranes was enhanced by the addition of PANI nanoparticles and showed improved fouling resistance and a high flux recovery ratio as well as improvement in BSA and humic acid rejection even with higher pore sizes. The modified membrane also showed less attack from the bacteria, demonstrating improved biofouling activity.
  1. Cheryan M, Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook, Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., USA, 1998p. 345.
  2. Baker RW, Membrane Technology and Application, John Wiley and Sons, England, 2004.
  3. Luo ML, Zhao JQ, Tang W, Pu CS, Appl. Surf. Sci., 249(1-4), 76 (2005)
  4. Chung YT, et al., J. Ind. Eng. Chem., http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.046 (2013)
  5. Steen ML, Jordan AC, Fisher ER, J. Membr. Sci., 204(1-2), 341 (2002)
  6. Pieracci J, Crivello JV, Belfort G, J. Membr. Sci., 202(1-2), 1 (2002)
  7. Susanto H, Ulbricht M, J. Membr. Sci., 327(1-2), 125 (2009)
  8. Rahimpour A, Madaeni SS, Shockravi A, Ghorbani S, J. Membr. Sci., 334(1-2), 64 (2009)
  9. Xu ZL, Chung TS, Loh KC, Lim BC, J. Membr. Sci., 158(1-2), 41 (1999)
  10. Qiu YR, Matsuyama H, Gao GY, Ou YW, Miao C, J. Membr. Sci., 338(1-2), 128 (2009)
  11. Marchese J, Ponce M, Ochoa NA, Pradanos P, Palacio L, Hernandez A, J. Membr. Sci., 211(1), 1 (2003)
  12. Surwade SP, Absolute molecular weight of polyaniline and synthesis of polyaniline-co-poly-2-methylaniline block copolymer, University of Texas at Dallas, 2009 (MSc Diss.).
  13. Kaner RB, Macdiarmid AG, Sci. Am., 106-111, 258 (1988)
  14. Kaner RB, Synth. Met., 125, 65 (2002)
  15. Ramakrishnan S, Conducting Polymers: From a Laboratory Curiosity to the Market Place, Springer, India, 2008p. 48 (Chapter 2).
  16. Kuwabata S, Martin CR, J. Membr. Sci., 91(1-2), 1 (1994)
  17. Naidua BVK, Sairam M, Raju KVSN, Aminabhavi TM, J. Membr. Sci., 260(1-2), 142 (2005)
  18. Wang P, Tan KL, Kang ET, Neoh KG, Appl. Surf. Sci., 193(1-4), 36 (2002)
  19. Fan ZF, Wang Z, Sun N, Wang JX, Wang SC, J. Membr. Sci., 320(1-2), 363 (2008)
  20. Gizdavic-Nikolaidis M, Travas-Sejdic J, Bowmaker GA, Cooney RP, Kilmartin PA, Synth. Met., 140, 225 (2004)
  21. Razali NF, Mohammad AW, Sulaiman AF, Adv. Mater. Res., 235, 3018 (2011)
  22. Razali NF, Mohammad AW, Hilal N, Leo CP, Alam J, Desalination, 311, 182 (2013)
  23. Razali NF, Mohammad AW, Alam J, Proceeding Paper in World Engineering Congress, 2010.
  24. Shi Q, Su YL, Zhu SP, Li C, Zhao YY, Jiang ZY, J. Membr. Sci., 303(1-2), 204 (2007)
  25. Lee W, Kang S, Shin H, J. Membr. Sci., 216(1-2), 217 (2003)
  26. Zhao S, Wang Z, Wei X, Zhao B, Wang J, Yang S, Wang X, J. Membr. Sci., 385-386, 251 (2011)
  27. Fan ZF, Wang Z, Duan MR, Wang JX, Wang SC, J. Membr. Sci., 310(1-2), 402 (2008)