화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.29, No.3, 369-376, March, 2012
DOI10.1007/s11814-011-0180-8  Export Citation
Effect of hydraulic retention time and temperature on submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) performance
Alireza Hemmati, Mohsen Maghami Dolatabad, Fereshteh Naeimpoor1, Afshin Pak, and Toraj Mohammdi†
  • Research Center for Membrane Separation Processes, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, Iran
  • 1Biotechnology Research Laboratory, School of Chemical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, Iran
E-mail:
Water shortages and strict environmental provisions necessitate wastewater renovation using various wastewater treatment methods, among which applications of submerged membrane bioreactors (SMBRs) are rapidly increasing due to their advantages such as high loading capacity and quality of effluent. In this work, the effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT 8, 10 and 12 h) and temperature (25, 30 and 35℃) on membrane fouling and sludge production was investigated in a 5-Liter SMBR equipped with immersed PVDF hollow fiber membrane module. Phenolic synthetic wastewater and acclimatized activated sludge with phenol during a 2-month period were used as toxic and microbial sources, respectively. Results showed that by increasing HRT membrane fouling decreases, while excellent treatment performance of over 99.5% phenol and 95% COD removals was achieved at all HRTs. Therefore, HRT=8h corresponding to the highest effluent flow rate of 12 L/m2·h was used to investigate the effect of temperature, resulting in phenol and COD removals of higher than 99 and 96%, respectively, at all temperatures. Membrane fouling occurred at 12, 5 and 3 days for 25, 30 and 35 ℃, respectively. Additionally, the effect of HRT and temperature on mixed liquor volatile suspended solid (MLVSS) as a measure of biomass was examined. MLVSS concentration showed decreases with increasing HRT and temperature. Overall, it was shown that SMBR can be used to efficiently treat phenolic wastewater at a range of flow rates and temperatures, among which HRT=8 h and T=25 ℃ are the preferred operating conditions, resulting in high flow rate and low membrane fouling.
Keywords:Submerged Membrane Bioreactor (SMBR);Hollow Fiber Membrane;Hydraulic Retention Time;Temperature;Membrane Fouling
  1. Judd S, The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier, Oxford (2006)
  2. Tragardh G, Johansson D, Desalination, 119(1-3), 21 (1998)
  3. Juang YC, Lee DJ, Lai JY, J. Chin. Ins. Chem. Eng., 39, 657 (2008)
  4. Delgado S, Diaz F, Villarroel R, Vera L, Diaz R, Elmaleh S, Desalination, 146(1-3), 445 (2002)
  5. Shin HS, Kang ST, Water Res., 37, 121 (2003)
  6. Zhang F, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1, 2859 (2009)
  7. Viero AF, Sant GL, A. Jr, J. Hazard. Mater., 150, 185 (2008)
  8. Meng FG, Yang FL, J. Membr. Sci., 305(1-2), 48 (2007)
  9. Zhang ST, Yang FL, Liu YH, Zhang XW, Yamada Y, Furukawa K, Desalination, 194(1-3), 146 (2006)
  10. Lee W, Kang S, Shin H, J. Membr. Sci., 216(1-2), 217 (2003)
  11. Le-Clech P, Jefferson B, Judd SJ, J. Membr. Sci., 218(1-2), 117 (2003)
  12. Wicaksana F, Fane AG, Chen V, J. Membr. Sci., 271(1-2), 186 (2006)
  13. Al-Amri A, Salim MR, Aris A, Desalination, 259(1-3), 111 (2010)
  14. Le-Clech P, Jefferson B, Judd SJ, Desalination, 173(2), 113 (2005)
  15. Tarleton ES, Wakeman RJ, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 71399 (1993)
  16. Defrance L, Jar€in MY, Gupta B, Paullier P, Geaugey V, Bioresur. Technol., 105 (2000)
  17. Lee W, Kang S, Shin H, J. Membr. Sci., 216(1-2), 217 (2003)
  18. Magara Y, Itoh M, Water Sci. Technol., 23, 1583 (1991)
  19. Lee J, Ahn WY, Lee CH, Water Res., 35(10), 2435 (2001)
  20. Chae SR, Watanabe Y, J. Water Environ. Technol., 5, 45 (2007)
  21. Hong SP, Bae TH, Tak TM, Hong S, Randall A, Desalination, 143(3), 219 (2002)
  22. Chae SR, Ahn YT, Kang ST, Shin HS, J. Member. Sci., 280, 16 (2006)
  23. Huang Z, Ong SL, Ng HY, Water Res., 1 (2010)
  24. Hong SP, Bae TH, Tak TM, Hong S, Randall A, Desalination, 143(3), 219 (2002)
  25. Tardiff O, Hall ER, Water Sci. Technol., 35, 57 (1997)
  26. Huuhilo T, Suvilampi J, Puro L, Rintala J, Manttari M, Nuortila J, Jokinen, Nystrom M, Paper and Timber., 84, 50 (2002)
  27. Ahn S, Congeevaram S, Choung YK, Park J, Desalination., 494 (2008)
  28. Martinez AB, Barbot E, Marrot B, Moulin P, Roche N, J. Membr. Sci., 288 (2006)
  29. Maghami M, Membrane bioreactor design for synthetic wastewater treatment, Master of Science Thesis in Chemical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (2010)
  30. American Public Health Association and American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Ed., Washington DC (1998)
  31. Greenberg AE, Trussell RR, Clesceri LS, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 16th Ed., 556 (1985)
  32. Cheremisinoff NP, The Biochemical Book: Biotechnology for Water and Wastewater Treatment (2001)
  33. Barrios-Martinez A, Barbot E, Marrot B, Moulin P, Roche N, J. Membr. Sci., 281(1-2), 288 (2006)
  34. Meng F, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang F, Water Res., 1489 (2009)
  35. Ren N, Chen Z, Wanga A, Hu D, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation., 55, 279 (2005)
  36. Kargi F, Konya I, J. Environ. Manage., 84, 20 (2007)
  37. Song KG, Cho J, Ahn KH, Bioprocess Biosystem Eng., 32, 135 (2009)
  38. Wang Z, Wu Z, Tang S, Water Res., 43, 2504 (2009)
  39. Suvilampi and JAerobic, wastewater treatment under high and varying temperature-thermophilic process performance and effluent quality, Doctoral Thesis, University of Jyvaskyla, 59 (2003)
  40. Barrios-Martinez A, Barbot E, Marrot B, Moulin P, Roche N, J. Membr. Sci., 281(1-2), 288 (2006)
  41. Joao CT, Rachel PR, Claudio MS, Valter RL, Process Biochem., 40, 1125 (2005)
  42. Ahn S, Congeevaram S, Choung YK, Park J, Desalination., 494 (2008)