Clean Technology, Vol.17, No.1, 56-61, March, 2011
감압잔사유 수첨분해반응의 생성물 분석방법 비교
Comparison of Analytical Methods of Products in Hydrocracking of Vacuum Residue
E-mail:
초록
감압잔사유를 고압 회분식 반응기에 넣고,상용 Ni-Mo/Al2O3 촉매를 이용하여 450℃ , 500 ℃ 에서 수첨분해하였다. 그리고 반응 생성물을 단증류 혹은 GC-SIMDIS 방법으로 각각 분석하였다. 먼저 수첨분해반응에서는 두 온도 조건 모두 촉매 반응 뿐만 아니라 열분해 반응도 같이 일어나고 있음을 확인하였고,온도가 증가할수록 전환율이 증가하고,생성물 중 가솔린 및 납사 비율이 높아졌다. 생성물 분석 결과,500 ℃ 반응에서는 단증류와 GC-SIMDIS 분석 결과의 차이가 없었지만,450 ℃ 반응에서는 단증류에서는디젤이,GC-SIMDIS에서는 vacuum gas oil이 주 생성물로 드러났다. 이는 450 ℃ 반응에서의 단증류 분석은 단증류에 의한 열분해 반응으로 인해 생성물의 선택도가 정확하지 않음을 알려준다.
In this study, hydrocarcking of vacuum residue was carried out in an autoclave reactor at 450°C and 500 °c with a commercial catalyst (HDM) and the quantitative product distributions were analyzed by GC-SIMDIS method or simple distillation. During catalytic hydrocracking, thermal cracking also occurred together with catalytic cracking and the higher conversion and selectivity of gasoline and naphtha were obtained at high reaction temperature. GC-SIMDIS and simple distillation revealed different results for the analysis of products produced at different hydrocracking temperatures; almost same results were obtained for the product produced at 500°C but different ones for the product produced at 450 °c. In the analysis of product produced at
450°C, the GC-SIMDIS showed that a main product was VGO while a main product in the simple distillation was diesel, which implies that the simple distillation for the 450°C reaction was not accurate due to thermal cracking of the product by the simple distillation.
- Morawski I, Mosio-Mosiewski J, Fuel Process. Technol., 87(7), 659 (2006)
- Delbianco A, Panariti N, Dicarlo S, Beltrame PL, Carniti P, Energy Fuels, 8(3), 593 (1994)
- Guisnet M, Magnoux P, Appl. Catal., 1-2, 83 (2001)
- Menon PG, J. Mol. Catal., 59, 207 (1990)
- Fabis G, Sarbak Z, Przem. Chem., 9, 423 (2004)
- Liu D, Cui WL, Zhang SY, Que GH, Energy Fuels, 22(6), 4165 (2008)
- Zhang SY, Deng WA, Luo H, Liu D, Que GH, Energy Fuels, 22(6), 3583 (2008)
- Matsumura A, Kondo T, Sato S, Saito S, Ferraz de Souza W, Fuel., 84, 411 (2005)
- Chang J, Tsubaki N, Fujimoto K, Yoshimoto M, Energy Fuels, 14(6), 1331 (2000)