Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.28, No.8, 1721-1726, August, 2011
Determination of optimal conditions for ribonucleic acid production by Candida tropicalis no. 121
E-mail:
The experiments were based on multivariate statistical concepts, and response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to optimize the fermentation medium for the production of ribonucleic acid (RNA) by Candida tropicalis no. 121. The process involved the individual adjustment and optimization of various medium components at shake flask level. The two-level Plackett-Burman (PB) design was used to screen the medium components, which significantly
influenced RNA production. Among seven variables, the concentrations of molasses, ZnSO4, and H3PO4 were found to be the important factors that significantly affected RNA production (confidence levels above 95%). These factors were further optimized using a central composite design (CCD) and RSM. The optimum values for the critical components were as follows: molasses 47.21 g/L: ZnSO4 0.048 g/L; H3PO4 1.19 g/L. Under optimal conditions, RNA production was 2.56 g/L, which was in excellent agreement with the predicted value (2.561 g/L), and led to a 2.1-fold increase compare with that using the original medium in RNA production.
Keywords:Candida tropicalis no. 121;Ribonucleic Acid;Ferment Production;Statistical Optimization;Response Surface Method
- Slobodianik NH, Nutrition., 19, 68 (2003)
- Kulshrestha Y, Husain Q, Enzym. Microbial. Technol., 88, 470 (2006)
- Carver JD, Pimentel B, William I, Pediatrics., 88, 359 (1991)
- Masor and J. Lee, US Patent 5,700,590 (1997)
- Herrick JLM, Shecterle JAS, Med. Hypoth., 72, 499 (2009)
- Qiu LP, Zhao GL, Wu H, Jiang L, Li XF, Liu JJ, Carbohyd.Polym., 80, 326 (2010)
- Xiao ZJ, Liu PH, Qin JY, Xu P, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 74(1), 61 (2007)
- Ying HJ, Chen XC, Cao HP, Xiong J, Hong Y, Bai JX, Li ZJ, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 84(4), 677 (2009)
- Kar S, Datta TK, Ray RC, Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 53, 301 (2010)
- Granato D, Castro DIA, Neves ELS, ML, J. Food Sci., 75, 149 (2010)
- Qu YY, Pi WQ, Ma F, Zhou JT, Zhang XW, Bioresour.Technol., 101, 4527 (2010)
- Kuenzi MT, Biotechnol. Lett., 3, 127 (1979)
- Li X, Ouyang J, Xu Y, Chen M, Song XY, Yong Q, Yu SY, Bioresour. Technol., 100, 3613 (2009)
- Kennedy M, Krouse D, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 6, 456 (1999)
- Plackett RL, Burman JP, Biometrika., 33, 305 (1946)
- Chen XC, Bai JX, Cao JM, Li ZJ, Xiong J, Zhang L, Hong Y, Ying HJ, Bioresour. Technol., 100, 919 (2009)
- Liu YP, Zheng P, Sun ZH, Ni Y, Dong JJ, Zhu LL, Bioresour. Technol., 99(6), 1736 (2008)
- Ye Q, Li XM, Yan M, Cao H, Xu L, Zhang YY, Chen Y, Xiong J, Ouyang PK, Ying HJ, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 87(2), 517 (2010)
- Jain R, Saxena J, Sharma V, Appl. Soil Ecol., 46, 90 (2010)
- Wang X, Wang XW, Yin MX, Xiao ZJ, Ma CQ, Lin ZX, Wang PG, Xu P, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 76(2), 321 (2007)
- Kery V, Kogan G, Zajacova K, Masler L, Alfoldi J, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 13, 87 (1991)
- O'Brien KM, Dirmeier R, Engle M, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 51817 (2004)
- Shivam K, Tripathi CPM, Mishra SK, Electron. J. Biotechnol. (2009)
- Siva V, Mansoor AK, Int. J. Pharmaceut., 234, 179 (2002)
- Cui FJ, Liu ZQ, Li Y, Ping LF, Ping LY, Zhang ZC, Lin L, Dong Y, Huang DM, Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng., 15, 299 (2010)