화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.16, No.5, 785-789, September, 2010
Thermodynamic analysis of calcium oxide assisted hydrogen production from biogas
E-mail:
This paper investigates calcium oxide assisted hydrogen production from biogas. Preliminary experiments were performed to compare the catalytic performance of combined carbon dioxide reforming and partial oxidation of biogas among four different adsorbent (CaO)/catalyst (Ni/SiO2-MgO) arrangements; i.e. (i) Ni/SiO2-MgO before CaO, (ii) CaO before Ni/SiO2-MgO, (iii) Ni/SiO2-MgO mixed with CaO, and (iv) Ni/SiO2-MgO without CaO. The mixture of CaO and Ni/SiO2-MgO was found to be the best arrangement, offering the highest hydrogen yield. Thermodynamic investigation of the integrated sorption-reaction systems for hydrogen production from biogas was performed. The system can be operated under thermal neutral condition when appropriate operating parameters are adjusted. Finally based on the thermal neutral operation, the effects of H2O/CH4 and CaO/CH4 ratios on the required O2/CH4 ratio, hydrogen yield, hydrogen concentration and CO/H2 ratio in product were determined. Obviously the use of CaO adsorbent can improve hydrogen production and there is an optimum H2O/CH4 ratio which offers the highest hydrogen production at each CaO/CH4 ratio. Increasing H2O/CH4 ratio generally increases H2/CO ratio but decreases hydrogen concentration in the product.
  1. Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H, Loss M, Meyer L, IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Published for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press (2005)
  2. Solieman AAA, Dijkstra JW, Haije WG, Cobden PD, van den Brink RW, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control., 3, 393 (2009)
  3. Um BH, Kim YS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 15, 297 (2009)
  4. Favre E, Bounaceur R, Roizard D, J. Membr. Sci., 328(1-2), 11 (2009)
  5. Davidson O, Metz B, Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, International Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, (www. ipcc.ch). (2005)
  6. Stromman AH, Hertwich EG, Hybrid life cycle assessment of large scale hydrogen production facilities, Reports and Working Papers from Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Industrial Ecology Programme (IndEcol), Working Papers No. 3/2004, 2004, ISSN:1504-3681.
  7. Reijers HTJ, Valster-Schiermeier SEA, Cobden PD, van den Brink RW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(8), 2522 (2006)
  8. Ida JI, Lin YS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 1999 (2003)
  9. Kato M, Yoshikawa S, Nakagawa K, J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 21(6), 485 (2002)
  10. Ochoa-Fernandez E, Rusten HK, Jakobsen HA, Ronning M, Holmen A, Chen D, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Gas.Fuel 05, Brugge, 41 (2005)
  11. Hufton JR, Mayorga S, Sircar S, AIChE J., 45(2), 248 (1999)
  12. Yong Z, Mata V, Rodriguez AE, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(1), 204 (2001)
  13. Mayorga SG, Gaffney TR, Brzozowski JR, Weigel SJ, European Patent 1,074, 297 (2001)
  14. Yong Z, Mata V, Rodrigues AE, Sep. Purif. Technol., 26, 95 (2002)
  15. Harrison DP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(17), 6486 (2008)
  16. Ochoa-Fernandez E, Haugen G, Zhao T, Rønning M, Aartun I, Børresen B, Rytter E, Rønnekleiv M, Chen D, Green Chem., 9, 654 (2007)
  17. Bjørnar A, Richard B, Egil B, Ival D, Jana J, Petter R, Energy Procedia., 1, 715 (2009)
  18. Lee SC, Choi BY, Lee TJ, Ryu CK, Soo YS, Kim JC, Catal. Today, 111(3-4), 385 (2006)
  19. Abbasian J, Khayyat AH, Development of highly durable and reactive regenerable magnesium-based sorbents for CO2 separation in coal gasification process. Final Technical Report for U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory (2005)
  20. Feng B, An H, Tan E, Energy Fuels, 21(2), 426 (2007)
  21. Abanades JC, Chem. Eng. J., 90(3), 303 (2002)
  22. Pholjaroen B, Laosiripojana N, Praserthdam P, Assabumrungrat S, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 15(4), 488 (2009)
  23. Ortiz AL, Harrison DP, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(23), 5102 (2001)