HYDRODENITROGENATION REACTION OF QUINOLINE WITH NASCENT HYDROGEN GENERATED FROM WATER GAS SHIFT REACTION

Kim SB; Choi MJ; Park DC; Lee KW

Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.8, No.3, 137-142, July, 1991

The HDN of quinoline was investigated for the purpose of utilizing the hydrogen which could be generated from the water gas shift reaction(WGSR). The optimum concentration of hydrogen were produced under 1.5 of water to carbon monoxide mole ratio and 6 hr^-1 of space velocity at 390℃ of temperature during WGSR over Co-Mo/Υ-Al₂O₃ catalyst. The HDN reactions were compared by using the pure hydrogen and the nascent hydrogen which was produced by a WGSR. The pure hydrogen gave much higher activity in the overall HDN reaction than the nascent hydrogen. However, kinetic study on the hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis and cracking reaction steps showed that only at the cracking reaction step the nascent hydrogen gave the superiority to the pure hydrogen. This inferiority of the nascent hydrogen in overall HDN reaction than the nascent hydrogen. However, kinetic study on the hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis and cracking reaction steps showed that only at the cracking reaction step the nascent hydrogen gave the superiority to the pure hydrogen. This inferiority of the nascent hydrogen in overall HDN reaction could be resulted from the negative effect of water which should be accompanied during WGSR. The conversion of the HDN reaction was maximized at the water pressure of 150kpa.

[References]

Appell HR, Wender I, Div. Fuel Chem. Am. Chem. Soc., 12, 220 (1968)
Takemura Y, Itoh H, Ouchi K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 20, 94 (1981)
Radbi MA, J. Mol. Catal., 22, 195 (1983)
Akgerman A, Kumar M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 23, 88 (1984)
Fragale C, Gargano M, Rossi M, J. Catal., 80, 460 (1983)
Hook BD, Akgermann A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 25, 278 (1986)
Murahashi SI, Imada Y, Hirai Y, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 62, 2968 (1989)
Satterfield CN, Smith CN, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 25, 942 (1986)
Yan JW, Wakatsuki T, Obara T, Yamada M, Sekiyu Gakkaishi, 32(3), 129 (1989)
Glutekin S, Khaleeq M, Al-Saleh MA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 729 (1989)
Hou P, Meeker D, Wise H, J. Catal., 80, 280 (1983)
Aboul-Gheit AK, Abdou IK, Int. Petroleum., 59, 188 (1973)
Shih SS, Katzer JR, Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Pet. Chem., 22, 919 (1977)
Satterfield CN, Coccheto N, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 20, 53 (1981)
Yu CY, Hatcher WJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 13 (1989)
McIlvried HG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 10, 125 (1971)
Gates BC, Katzer JR, Olson TH, Kwart H, Stiles AB, DOE Report University of Delaware, N.Y. (1978)
Glutekin S, Al-Ohali MS, Al-Saleh MA, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 265 (1985)

[1] Appell HR, Wender I, Div. Fuel Chem. Am. Chem. Soc., 12, 220 (1968)

[2] Takemura Y, Itoh H, Ouchi K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 20, 94 (1981)

[3] Radbi MA, J. Mol. Catal., 22, 195 (1983)

[4] Akgerman A, Kumar M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 23, 88 (1984)

[5] Fragale C, Gargano M, Rossi M, J. Catal., 80, 460 (1983)

[6] Hook BD, Akgermann A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 25, 278 (1986)

[7] Murahashi SI, Imada Y, Hirai Y, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 62, 2968 (1989)

[8] Satterfield CN, Smith CN, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 25, 942 (1986)

[9] Yan JW, Wakatsuki T, Obara T, Yamada M, Sekiyu Gakkaishi, 32(3), 129 (1989)

[10] Glutekin S, Khaleeq M, Al-Saleh MA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 729 (1989)

[11] Hou P, Meeker D, Wise H, J. Catal., 80, 280 (1983)

[12] Aboul-Gheit AK, Abdou IK, Int. Petroleum., 59, 188 (1973)

[13] Shih SS, Katzer JR, Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Pet. Chem., 22, 919 (1977)

[14] Satterfield CN, Coccheto N, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 20, 53 (1981)

[15] Yu CY, Hatcher WJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 13 (1989)

[16] McIlvried HG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 10, 125 (1971)

[17] Gates BC, Katzer JR, Olson TH, Kwart H, Stiles AB, DOE Report University of Delaware, N.Y. (1978)

[18] Glutekin S, Al-Ohali MS, Al-Saleh MA, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 265 (1985)