화학공학소재연구정보센터
Polymer, Vol.49, No.10, 2515-2519, 2008
On the thermodynamic driving force for nucleation at large undercoolings
The molar free energy difference Delta G(f), between amorphous and Crystalline phases, is computed using heat capacity data over a large temperature range between the melting (T-m(0)) and the glass transition I temperatures. These values are used to assess the validity of the approximate correction factors, P = T/T-m(0) and f(H2) = 2T/(T+T-m(0)), suggested by Hoffman [Thermodynamic driving force in nucleation and growth processes. J Chem Phys 1958;29(5):1192-93], and widely used in the literature for a variety of polymers to account for the change in free energy with temperature, T. Surprisingly, for polyethylene and isotactic polypropylene, which are industrially important polymers, it is found that the performance of these correction factors is worse than uncorrected estimates. For isotactic polystyrene and polyethylene oxide, it is found that the correction factor f(H2) offers a good approximation for the free energy of fusion at moderate to large undercoolings, although Hoffman's criterion recommends the use of f(H1). Empirical correction factors that provide a better fit with the experimental data, and a computer program used to determine them are also provided. Published by Elsevier Ltd.