Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.22, No.1, 21-29, March, 2010
The role of interfacial elasticity on the rheological behavior of polymer blends
E-mail:
In this work, the influence of interfacial modification on the rheological behavior of polymer blends was investigated. First, commercial blends of polyamide-6 and ethylene-propylene copolymer, PA6/EPM, noncompatibilized and compatibilized with EPM grafted with maleic anhydride, with high viscosity and elasticity ratios were studied. The observation of the morphology frozen during extension tests seemed to indicate that the droplets of the highly compatibilized blends are slightly deformed unlike those of the noncompatibilized ones. Stress relaxation experiments, both in shear and extension, showed that the introduction of the compatibilizer leads to the appearance of a second very long relaxation mechanism, the question then being what is its cause. In order to better understand the relative importance of relaxation of the droplets and relaxation of the interfaces in this kind of compatibilized blends, model high viscosity ratio
blends of optically transparent materials, in this case poly(methylmethacrylate), PMMA, polystyrene, PS, and oxazoline-modified polystyrene, PSOX were prepared. This allows Small Angle Light Scattering (SALS) to be used in dilute blends to complement the rheometrical characterization and thus evaluate the deformation of the droplets in transient shear flows. In these blends there is also an additional longer relaxation time present but no changes in the morphology can be readily observed. In addition, the blend with functionalized PS shows a droplet deformation in the vorticity direction, which is an indication of an increase in the elasticity of the interface. Thus, our findings seem to indicate that the main factor behind the increase in relaxation time stress relaxation at and in the interfaces and not droplet deformation and recovery. The role of the elasticity of the interface became quite clear when PP/EVOH blends, non-compatibilized and compatibilized with Na+ were tested. In this case the elasticity of the interface is negligible and it was observed that the compatibilization does not alter significantly the relaxation behavior after a step deformation.
- Abad MJ, Ares A, Barral L, Cano J, Diez FJ, Garcia-Garabal S, Lopez J, Ramirez C, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 94(4), 1763 (2004)
- Ares A, Silva J, Maia J, Barral L, Abad MJ, Rheomechanical and morphological study of compatibilized PP/EVOH blends, submited to Rheologica Acta. (2009)
- Asthana H, Jayaraman K, Macromolecules, 32(10), 3412 (1999)
- Barroso VC, Covas JA, Maia JM, Rheol. Acta, 41(1-2), 154 (2002)
- Barroso VC, Maia JM, Rheol. Acta, 41(3), 257 (2002)
- Barroso VC, Ribeiro SP, Maia JM, Rheol. Acta, 42(4), 345 (2003)
- Borschig C, Fries B, Gronski W, Weis C, Friedrich C, Polymer, 41(8), 3029 (2000)
- Datta S, Lohse D, Polymeric compatibilizers (Hanser, Munich, 1996a)
- Datta S, Lohse D, Polymeric compatibilizers, uses and benefits in polymer blends (Hanser, Munich, 1996b)
- Fahrlander M, Bruch M, Menke T, Friedrich C, Rheol. Acta, 40(1), 1 (2001)
- Graebling D, Muller R, Palierne JF, Macromolecules, 26, 320 (1993)
- Gramespacher H, Meissner J, J. Rheol., 41(1), 27 (1997)
- Handge UA, Potschke P, J. Rheol., 48(5), 1103 (2004)
- He Y, Zhu B, Inoue Y, Progress in Polymer Science, 29, 1021 (2004)
- Hobbie EK, Migler KB, Physical Review Letters, 82, 5393 (1999)
- Huo YL, Groeninckx G, Moldenaers P, Rheol. Acta, 46(4), 507 (2007)
- Iza M, Bousmina M, Jerome R, Rheol. Acta, 40(1), 10 (2001)
- Jacobs U, Fahrlander M, Winterhalter J, Friedrich C, J. Rheol., 43(6), 1495 (1999)
- Koning C, Van Duin M, Pagnoulle C, Jerome R, Progress in Polymer Science, 23, 707 (1998)
- Lin B, Mighri F, Huneault MA, Sundararaj U, Macromolecules, 38(13), 5609 (2005)
- Macaubas PHP, Demarquette NR, Dealy JM, Rheol. Acta, 44(3), 295 (2005)
- Maia JM, Covas JA, Nobrega JM, Dias TF, Alves FE, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 80(2-3), 183 (1999)
- Mechbal N, Bousmina M, Macromolecules, 40(4), 967 (2007)
- Mechbal N, Bousmina M, Rheol. Acta, 43(2), 119 (2004)
- Mighri F, Huneault MA, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 100(4), 2582 (2006)
- Migler KB, J. Rheol., 44(2), 277 (2000)
- Oosterlinck F, Mours M, Laun HM, Moldenaers P, J. Rheol., 49(4), 897 (2005)
- Riemann RE, Cantow HJ, Friedrich C, Macromolecules, 30(18), 5476 (1997)
- Sailer C, Handge UA, Macromolecules, 40(6), 2019 (2007)
- Shi D, Ke Z, Yang JH, Gao Y, Wu J, Yin JH, Macromolecules, 35(21), 8005 (2002)
- Silva J, Machado AV, Maia J, Rheol. Acta, 46(8), 1091 (2007)
- Silva J, Machado AV, Moldenaers P, Maia JM, The effect of interfacial properties on the deformation and relaxation behavior of PMMA/PS blends, J. Rheol., 2009, submitted.
- Utracki LA, Encyclopaedic dictionary of commercial polymer blends (ChemTec, Toronto, 1994)
- Utracki LA, Polym. Eng. Sci., 23, 602 (1983)
- Van Hemelrijck E, Van Puyvelde P, Velankar S, Macosko CW, Moldenaers P, J. Rheol., 48(1), 143 (2004)
- Van Puyvelde P, Oommen Z, Koets P, Groeninckx G, Moldenaers P, Polym. Eng. Sci., 43(1), 71 (2003)
- Van Puyvelde P, Velankar S, Moldenaers P, Curr. Opin. Coll. Int. Sci., 6, 457 (2001)
- Vermant J, Vandebril S, Dewitte C, Moldenaers P, Rheol. Acta, 47, 835 (2008)
- Yee M, Calvao PS, Demarquette NR, Rheol. Acta, 46(5), 653 (2007)