Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.26, No.2, 534-541, March, 2009
Application of gain scheduling for modeling the nonlinear dynamic characteristics of NOx emissions from utility boilers
E-mail:
A hierarchical gain scheduling (HGS) approach is proposed to model the nonlinear dynamics of NOx emissions of a utility boiler. At the lower level of HGS, a nonlinear static model is used to schedule the static parameters of local linear dynamic models (LDMs), such as static gains and static operating conditions. According to upper level scheduling variables, a multi-model method is used to calculate the predictive output based on lower-level LDMs. Both static and dynamic experiments are carried out at a 360MW pulverized coal-fired boiler. Based on these data, a nonlinear static model using artificial neural network (ANN) and a series of linear dynamic models are obtained. Then, the performance of the HGS model is compared to the common multi-model in predicting NOx emissions, and experimental results indicate that the proposed HGS model is much better than the multi-model in predicting NOx emissions in the dynamic process.
- Zhang Y, Ding Y, Wu Z, Kong L, Chou T, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(6), 1118 (2007)
- Visona SP, Stanmore BR, Chem. Eng. Sci., 53(11), 2013 (1998)
- Coimbra CFM, Azevedo JLT, Carvalho MG, Fuel, 73, 1128 (1994)
- Zhou H, Cen KF, Fan JR, Energy, 29(1), 167 (2004)
- Zhou H, Cen KF, Mao JB, Fuel, 80, 2163 (2001)
- Christopher AJ, Roger L, Proceedings of int’l joint power generation conference, Baltimore (1998)
- Booth RC, Roland WB, Proceedings of dynamic modeling control applications for industry workshop, Vancouver (1998)
- Laungphairojana A, Boiler operation optimization for air pollution control, Vanderbilt Univ. Press (2003)
- Piche S, Sayyar-Rodsari B, Johnson D, Gerules M, Control Systems Magazine, 20, 53 (2000)
- Rugh WJ, Shamma JS, Automatica, 36(10), 1401 (2000)
- Astrom KJ, Wittenamrk B, Adaptive control, Beijing, Science Press (2003)
- Chen PC, Shamma JS, J. Process Control, 14(3), 263 (2004)
- Huang ZY, Li DH, Jiang XZ, Sun LM, Proceedings of the CSEE, 23, 191 (2003)
- Petridis V, Kehagias A, Automatica, 34(4), 469 (1998)
- Chen LJ, Narendra KS, Automatica, 37(8), 1245 (2001)
- Fu Y, Chai TY, Automatica, 43(6), 1101 (2007)
- Rugh WJ, Shamma JS, Automatica, 36(10), 1401 (2000)
- Costa EF, Oliveira VA, Automatica, 38(7), 1247 (2002)
- Lawrence DA, Automatica, 37(7), 1041 (2001)
- Doyle FJ, Kwatra HS, Schwaber JS, Chem. Eng. Sci., 53(15), 2675 (1998)
- Al-Duwaish H, Naeem W, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE international conference on control applications, Mexico City (2001)
- Johjns AT, Warne DF, Thermal power plant simulation and control, London, The Institution of Electrical Engineers (2003)
- Fang LL, Gao ZY, Proceedings of the CSEE, 23, 211 (2003)
- Chung DH, Yang JB, Noh DS, Kim WB, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(4), 489 (1999)
- Kalogirou SA, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 29, 515 (2003)