Two propositions relating to the interpretation of size-exclusion chromatograms (SEC) of coal-derived materials in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP) have been examined. These were iii that signal peaks showing up at exclusion (short retention time) limits of SEC columns are due to sample polarity alone and (ii) that shifts in SEC chromatograms to longer retention times, observed upon addition of LiBr to the eluent (NMP), are due to dissipation of ionic binding forces, causing disaggregation of polar clusters that would otherwise have appeared at retention times appropriate to larger molecular masses. In our experiments, effects due to polarity and molecular mass have been isolated by using two nonpolar samples (a naphthalene mesophase pitch and a mixture of fullerenes). In the presence of LiBr, precipitation of solute out of solution and shifts of chromatograms to longer retention times, unrelated to sample polarity, have been observed. A partial breakdown of the size exclusion mechanism was identified by the observed extension of chromatograms beyond the permeation limit of the column, similar to those observed when using eluents of insufficient solvent strength (e.g., THF, chloroform). Dosing LiBr into NMP sharply reduces the solvent power of NMP for coal-derived solutes. In the absence of LiBr, SEC chromatograms of the fullerene mixture, the naphthalene mesophase pitch, and its fractions separated by planar chromatography clearly showed significant signal under the "excluded" peak, entirely due to nonpolar material. The damage caused to the SEC column arising from precipitation of sample, in the presence of LiBr, was not permanent as had originally been feared. The balance of the evidence suggests that polarity of some molecules may cause shifts in their elution times to shorter values (larger apparent molecular masses) and that these may overlap with signal from large molecular mass material.