화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.19, No.3, 125-131, November, 2007
Export Citation
Compatibility of biodegradable poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) blends for packaging application
Amita Bhatia, Rahul K. Gupta†, Sati. N. Bhattacharya, and H. J. Choi1
  • Rheology and Materials Processing Centre, School of Civil, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia
  • 1Department of Polymer Science and Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Korea
E-mail:
Biodegradable polymeric blends are expected to be widely used by industry due to their environmental friendliness and comparable mechanical and thermal properties. Poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and poly (butylene succinate) (PBS) are such biodegradable polymers which aim to replace commodity polymers in future applications. Since cost and brittleness of PLA is quite high, it is not economically feasible to use it alone for day to day use as a packaging material without blending. In this study, blends of PLA and PBS with various compositions were prepared by using a laboratory-scale twin-screw extruder at 180℃. Morphological, thermal, rheological and mechanical properties were investigated on the samples obtained by compression molding to explore suitability of these compositions for packaging applications. Morphology of the blends was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Morphology showed a clear phase difference trend depending on blend composition. Modulated differential scanning calorimetry (MDSC) thermograms of the blends indicated that the glass transition temperature (Tg) of PLA did not change much with the addition of PBS, but analysis showed that for PLA/PBS blend of up to 80/20 composition there is partial miscibility between the two polymers. The tensile strength and modulus were measured by the Instron Universal Testing Machine. Tensile strength, modulus and percentage (%) elongation at break of the blends decreased with PBS content. However, tensile strength and modulus values of PLA/PBS blend for up to 80/20 composition nearly follow the mixing rule. Rheological results also show miscibility between the two polymers for PBS composition less than 20% by weight. PBS reduced the brittleness of PLA, thus making it a contender to replace plastics for packaging applications. This work found a partial miscibility between PBS and PLA by investigating thermal, mechanical and morphological properties.
Keywords:poly (lactic acid) (PLA);poly (butylene succinate) (PBS);biodegradable polymers;miscibility;mechanical properties;rheological property;blends;morphology
  1. Bhari K, Mitomo H, Enjoji T, Yoshii F, Makuuchi K, Polym. Degrad. Stabil., 62, 551 (1998)
  2. Doi Y, Kasuya K, Abe H, Koyama N, Ishiwatara S, Takagi K, Yoshida Y, Polym. Degrad. Stabil., 51, 281 (1996)
  3. Doi Y, Fukuda K, Stud. Polym. Sci., Elsevier, 627, 12 (1994)
  4. Fujimura T, Iwakura K, Int. Chem. Eng., 10, 683 (1970)
  5. Fujimura T, Iwakura K, Kobunshi Ronbunshu, 31, 617 (1974)
  6. Gajria AM, Dave V, Gross RA, Mccarthy SP, Polymer, 37(3), 437 (1996)
  7. Genillon R, May JF, 5th Conf. Europ. Plast. Caoutch, Paris, paper E-12 (1978)
  8. Huang JC, Shetty AS, Wang MS, Adv. Polym. Technol., 10, 23 (1990)
  9. Lee S, Lee JW, Korea-Aust. Rheol. J., 17(2), 71 (2005)
  10. McCarthy SP, Gross RA, Ma W, University of Massachusetts. U S Patent, 883,199, Mar, 5 (1999)
  11. Nijenhuis AJ, Colstee E, Grijpma DW, Pennings AJ, Polymer, 37(26), 5849 (1996)
  12. Nishioka M, Tuzuki T, Wanajyo Y, Oonami H, Horiuchi T, Japan Stud, Polym. Sci., 12, 584 (1994)
  13. Ogata N, Jimenez G, Kawai H, Ogihara T, J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys., 35(2), 389 (1997)
  14. Perego G, Cella GD, Bastioli C, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 59(1), 37 (1996)
  15. Prest WM, Porter RS, Polym. Sci. Part A-2, 10, 1639 (1972)
  16. Qi F, Hanna MA, Ind. Crop. Prod., 10, 47 (1999)
  17. Ramkumar DHS, Bhattacharya M, Polym. Eng. Sci., 38(9), 1426 (1998)
  18. Ray SS, Bousmina M, Progress in Materials Science, 50, 962 (2005)
  19. Roberts RC, J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Letters, 8, 381 (1970)
  20. Sheth M, Kumar RA, Dave V, Gross RA, Mccarthy SP, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 66(8), 1495 (1997)
  21. Shin TK, Kim J, Choi HJ, John MS, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 77(6), 1348 (2000)
  22. Sweet GE, Bell JP, J. Polym. Sci. A-2: Polym. Phys., 10, 1273 (1972)
  23. Tsuji H, Ikada Y, Polymer, 37(4), 595 (1996)
  24. Utracki LA, Polym. Eng. Sci., 23, 602 (1983)
  25. Zhang LL, Xiong CD, Deng XM, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 56(1), 103 (1995)