Chlamydia trachomatis is a widespread bacterium that causes trachoma and genital tract infections in humans. The fact that the growth of this pathogen does not normally occur outside living cells poses a challenge in its diagnosis. The present study aimed to compare the efficacies of different molecular and cultural methods in the detection of C. trachomatis in urine samples collected from patients with urinary tract infections. Examined detection methods involved the Gen-Probe C. trachomatis (GP-CT) assay, direct antigen detection by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. The efficacies of these methods were compared to that of the cell culture technique depending on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. C. trachomatis was detected in 25 out of 50 (50%) of examined urine samples using the cell culture method. Compared with this standard technique, the GP-CT assay was the most sensitive procedure, being able to detect the pathogen in all positive samples, followed by PCR and ELISA, which showed 60% and 40% sensitivities, respectively. PCR and ELISA displayed the highest level of specificity (100%) compared to the cell culture method with the GP-CT assay showing 40% specificity. The rate of accuracy was comparable between the GP-CT, PCR, and ELISA methods ranging from 70-80% of the accuracy of the cell culture method. The above results suggest that C. trachomatis is a frequent pathogen associated with upper and lower urinary tract infections. Both the GP-CT assay and PCR method can be recommended as reliable detection methods for C. trachomatis, and the GP-CT can be used as a screening tool.