Complying with the obligation in the current ozone directive, the European Commission dame forward in 1999 with a strategy to combat tropospheric ozone together with a proposed revision of the air quality legislation for this pollutant. As a daughter legislation under the 1996 Framework Directive on Air Quality, the proposed ozone daughter directive defines for the first time (interim) air quality targets for ozone to be attained by 2010, complemented by long-term objectives for ozone based on the guideline values of the World Health Organisation. It also sets out enhanced requirements for monitoring and assessment of ozone concentrations, as well as minimum criteria for appropriate information of the public about the measured air pollution. In the past, abatement strategies against air pollution consisted of concrete obligations for controlling emissions derived solely on the basis of technical and economic aspects, covering specific types of installations or activities, thus with no direct quantitative relationship to the level of air pollution let alone to its effects. In compensating this deficit, the Commission presented, as a complement to the existing sectoral legislation, a proposal for a directive on national emission ceilings (NEC) which quantifies emission targets for every Member State to bring its total precursor emissions by 2010 down to levels being considered as necessary to achieve everywhere on a regional scale the air quality targets set in the ozone daughter directive. As the core element of the ozone abatement strategy, the national ceilings for emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), ammonia (NH3) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) were derived from a cost-effectiveness analysis integrating information on economic, technical, physical and biological aspects of ozone pollution and abatement. This integrated assessment considers the potential and costs for further emission control in the various economic sectors in the Member States and combines this with information on ozone formation and transport processes in the atmosphere and with indicators for the impact of ozone on human health and environmental. Reflecting the discussions with Member Slates and stakeholders, a number of decisive steps in the process of deriving the national emission ceilings are presented here: the way of framing interim objectives, how to choose an appropriate ambition level, aspects of how to cope with uncertainties in the model and the input data and how to treat extreme meteorological situations and resolve problems in the spatial distribution of the interim objectives given the different size of countries. Finally, the paper explains the scenario underpinning the proposed national emission ceilings, its environmental gains and the distribution of cost incurring for emission control measures in Member States.