화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Journal of the Korean Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.18, No.3, 213-217, June, 2007
Export Citation
유전체 장벽 방전에 의한 벤젠의 분해
Decomposition of Benzene by Dielectric Barrier Discharge
이용훈, 이재호, 박동화†
  • 인하대학교 화학공학과/열플라즈마환경기술연구센터
Yong Hun Lee, Jae-Ho Lee, and Dong-Wha Park†
  • Department of Chemical Engineering and RIC-ETTP (Regional Innovation Center for Environmental Technology of Thermal Plasma), Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Korea
E-mail:
초록
본 연구에서는 유전체장벽방전을 이용하여 휘발성 유기화합물의 일종인 벤젠의 분해 경향과 분해 생성물의 선택성에 대해서 연구하였다. 유전체장벽방전의 공정변수에 따른 벤젠의 분해율과 분해 생성물의 선택성을 높이기 위해서 반응기 내부에 촉매(H-ZSM-5, Na-Y)를 사용하였다. 실험은 대기압에서 수행하였으며, 방전전압, 체류시간, 농도 등의 공정변수에 따른 분해율을 조사하였다. 유전체 장벽방전만을 사용하는 방법과 비교하여 여기에 촉매를 동시에 사용하는 하이브리드 방전이 같은 전압과 체류시간조건에서 보다 효과적인 벤젠의 분해 방법임을 확인하였다.
Decomposition of benzene and selectivity of byproducts were investigated by using Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) at atmospheric pressure. In order to increase the decomposition rate and selectivity of byproducts, two types of catalysts, H-ZSM-5 and Na-Y, were optionally employed inside the reactor of the process. The decomposition efficiency of benzene was investigated on the DBD and DBD/catalyst systems at various processing parameters including discharge voltage, residence time, and concentration of benzene. The results showed that, compared with the DBD only, the catalyst-assisted DBD process as a hybrid discharge type had an improved decomposition efficiency at the same process conditions of discharge voltage and residence time.
Keywords:dielectric barrier discharge;catalyst;benzene;discharge voltage;decomposition efficiency
  1. Ogata A, Yamanouchi K, Mizuno K, Kushiyama S, Yamamoto T, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., 19(3), 383 (1999)
  2. Oh SM, Kim HH, Ogata A, Einaga H, Futamura S, Park DW, Catal. Lett., 99(1-2), 101 (2005)
  3. Oh SM, Kim HH, Einaga H, Ogata A, Futamura S, Park DW, Thin Solid Films, 506, 418 (2006)
  4. Zhang A, Futamura S, Yamamoto T, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 49, 1442 (1999)
  5. Kang HC, Woo IS, Kang AS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 6(4), 231 (2000)
  6. Ogata A, Yamanouchi K, Mizuno K, Kushiyama S, Yamamoto T, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 35, 1289 (1999)
  7. Kohno H, Berezin AA, Chang JS, Tamura M, Yamamoto T, Shibuya A, Honda S, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 34, 953 (1998)
  8. Xia JF, Gao XX, Kong JY, Hui HX, Cui M, Yan KP, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., 20(2), 225 (2000)
  9. Yamamoto T, Chang JS, Berezin AA, Kohno H, Honda S, Shibuya A, J. Adv. Oxid. Technol., 1, 67 (1996)
  10. Einaga H, Ibusuki T, Futamura S, Conf. Rec. 2000 IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 2, 858 (2000)
  11. Chang JS, Myint T, Chakrabarti A, Miziolek A, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 36, 5018 (1997)
  12. Francke KP, Miessner H, Rudolph R, Catal. Today, 59(3-4), 411 (2000)
  13. Chang JS, J. Aerosol Sci., 20, 1089 (1989)
  14. Woo IS, Kang HC, Cho JK, Hwang MW, Kang AS, Yamaguma M, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 7(2), 105 (2001)