Energy & Fuels, Vol.20, No.5, 1965-1972, 2006
Mass spectral analysis of asphaltenes. I. Compositional differences between pressure-drop and solvent-drop asphaltenes determined by electrospray ionization Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry
Asphaltenes are typically defined by their solubility in benzene and insolubility in pentane or heptane. They are believed to exist in petroleum crude oil as a colloidal suspension, stabilized by surface-adsorbed resins. Their normal equilibrium under reservoir conditions may be disrupted during production by pressure reduction, crude oil chemical composition changes, introduction of miscible gases and liquids, and mixing with diluents and other oils, as well as by acid stimulation, hot oiling, and other oilfield operations. Electrospray ionization preferentially ionizes polar N-, S-, and O- containing compounds, and its combination with ultrahigh- resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry makes a powerful tool for the compositional analysis of petroleum- derived materials such as asphaltenes. In this work, we compare the compositional differences between heptane- precipitated asphaltenes and asphaltenes collected by live oil depressurization. Negative- and positive- ion electrospray yield the acidic and basic species, respectively. We find that the heptane-precipitated asphaltenes contain higher double bond equivalents ( number of rings plus double bonds) compared to the asphaltenes induced by pressure drop. On the other hand, the pressure-drop product exhibits a higher abundance of species containing sulfur. Thus, the solubility criterion for asphaltenes defines a significantly different chemical composition than the ( more field- relevant) pressure- drop criterion.