Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.22, No.6, 865-872, November, 2005
Effect of Different Reduction Methods on the Efficiencies in the Chemical Decontamination Processes
E-mail:
Chemical decontamination is considered to be an effective method for reduction of radiation level by dissolution of radioactive corrosion products and metal oxidizing films existing in the primary system of a nuclear power plant. In this study, the process efficiencies of two chemical decontamination processes (Methods 1 and 2) having different reduction steps were investigated through the operation of a semi-pilot scale decontamination equipment as a continuous work. The reduction step for Method 1 employed an adsorbent with an oxygen source, while a reductant (oxalic acid) was used in the reduction step for Method 2. The dissolution and removal efficiencies of metal species and organic compounds in Method 2 were higher than those in Method 1, implying that oxalic acid in the reduction step increased the process efficiency, their complexes of metal species easily being removed in the decomposition/cleanup step. It was shown that the process employing chemical reduction showed higher dissolution and removal efficiencies rather than the process by the physical adsorption on the adsorbent surface through decontamination processes with different reduction step.
- Ayres JA, Decontamination of Nuclear Reactors and Equipment, Ronald Press, New York (1970)
- Choi W, Kim S, Cho S, Yoo HI, Kim MH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(6), 898 (2001)
- Dastgheib SA, Rockstraw DA, Carbon, 39, 1849 (2001)
- Faur-Brasquet C, Kadiruvelu K, Le Chloirec P, Carbon, 40, 2387 (1996)
- Frim JA, Rathman JF, Weavers LK, Water Res., 37, 3155 (2003)
- Gregg SJ, Sing KSW, Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity, Academic Press, London (1982)
- Juang RS, Wang YC, Water Res., 37, 845 (2003)
- Kahlili NR, Campbell M, Sandi G, Golas J, Carbon, 38, 1905 (2000)
- Kim HJ, Moon H, Park HC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2(2), 181 (1985)
- Kim K, Lee HJ, Choi M, Kang DW, Inoue S, Nucl. Eng. Des., 229, 91 (2004)
- Kim K, Lee HJ, Kang DW, Inoue S, Nucl. Eng. Des., 223, 329 (2003)
- Kim MH, Lee EK, Jun JH, Han GY, Kong SJ, Lee BK, Lee TJ, Yoon KJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 835 (2003)
- Kim SJ, Shim WG, Kim TY, Moon H, Kim SJ, Cho SY, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(6), 967 (2002)
- Kong SH, Kwon CI, Kim MH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(2), 293 (2003)
- Lee HJ, Kang DW, Chi J, Lee DH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(3), 503 (2003)
- Lee HJ, Kang DW, Lee YJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(4), 895 (2004)
- Lucking F, Koser H, Jank M, Ritter A, Water Res., 32, 2607 (1998)
- Moon JK, Byun KH, Park SY, Oh WZ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 14(6), 521 (1997)
-
Nowack B, Sigg L, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 177(1), 106 (1996)
- Nowack B, Lutzenkirchen J, Behra P, Sigg L, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 2397 (1996)
- Ocken H, Decontamination Handbook, EPRI Report TR-112352, EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute), Palo Alto (1999)
- Ravikmar JX, Gurol MD, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 394 (1994)
- Ridge AC, Sedlak DL, Water Res., 38, 921 (2004)
-
Seco A, Marzal P, Gabaldon C, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 68(1), 23 (1997)
- Song JH, Yeon KH, Cho J, Moon SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(1), 108 (2005)
- Toles CA, Marshall WE, Jones MM, Carbon, 35, 1407 (1997)
- Varrin R, Jr., Characterization of PWR Steam Generator Deposits, EPRI Report TR-106048, EPRI, Palo Alto (1996)
-
Varga K, Baradlai P, Hirschberg G, Nemeth Z, Oravetz D, Schunk J, Tilky P, Electrochim. Acta, 46(24-25), 3783 (2001)
- Warhurst AM, Fowler GD, McConnachie GL, Pollard SJT, Carbon, 35, 1039 (1997)
- Wood CJ, Spalaris CN, Sourcebook for Chemical Decontamination of Nuclear Power Plants, EPRI Special Report NP-6433, EPRI, Palo Alto (1989)
- Yim MS, Ocken H, Prog. Nucl. Energy, 39, 31 (2001)