Despite the hydrodynamics of trickle beds experiencing high pressures has become largely documented in the recent literature, trickle bed hydrodynamic behavior at elevated temperatures, on the contrary, largely remains terra incognita. This study's aim was to demonstrate experimentally the temperature shift of trickle-to-pulse flow regime transition, pulse velocity, two-phase pressure drop, liquid holdup and liquid axial dispersion coefficient. These parameters were determined for Newtonian (air-water) and non-Newtonian (air-0.25% Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC)) liquids, and the various experimental results were compared to available literature models and correlations for confrontation and recommendations. The trickle-to-pulse flow transition boundary shifted towards higher gas and liquid superficial velocities with increasingly temperatures, aligning with the findings on pressure effects which likewise were confirmed to broaden the trickle flow domain. The Larachi-Charpentier-Favier diagram [Larachi et al., 1993, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 71, 319-321] provided good predictions of the transition locus at elevated temperature for Newtonian liquids. Conversely, everything else being kept identical, increasingly temperatures occasioned a decrease in both two-phase pressure drop and liquid holdup; whereas pulse velocity was observed to increase with temperature. The Iliuta and Larachi slit model for non-Newtonian fluids [Iliuta and Larachi, 2002, Chemical Engineering Science 46, 1233-1246] predicted with very good accuracy both the pressure drops and the liquid holdups regardless of pressure and temperature without requiring any adjustable parameter. The Burghardt et al. [2004, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 43, 4511-4521] pulse velocity correlation can be recommended for preliminary engineering calculations of pulse velocity at elevated temperature, pressure, Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquids. The liquid axial dispersion coefficient (Dax) extracted from the axial dispersion RTD model revealed that temperatures did not affect in a substantial manner this parameter. Both Newtonian and power-law non-Newtonian fluids behaved qualitatively similarly regarding the effect of temperature. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.