화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.101, 387-396, September, 2021
DOI10.1016/j.jiec.2021.05.044  Export Citation
Performance of Mg-Ti modified iron-based catalyst in NH3-SCR of NO at the presence of arsenic: Influence of oxygen and temperature
Xiaoyu Li, Juan Chen†, Shouyan Chen, Chunmei Lu1, Guangqian Luo2, and Hong Yao2
  • National Engineering Laboratory for Reducing Emissions from Coal Combustion, Engineering Research Center of Environmental Thermal Technology of Ministry of Education, Shandong Key Laboratory of Energy Carbon Reduction and Resource Utilization, School of E, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • 1School of Energy and Power Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • 2State Key Laboratory of Coal Combustion, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
E-mail:
Impact of arsenic on the performance of Mg-Ti modified iron-based catalyst during selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia was studied. The results indicated that Mg and Ti modification not only improved the catalytic activity at 100-350 °C, but also exhibited remarkable anti-arsenic ability. Mg was dominant in the excellent anti-arsenic performance, and this role was firstly recognized. The anti-arsenic mechanism of Mg-Ti modified iron-based catalyst was ascribed to two aspects. One side, Mg exhibited well reactivity with arsenic which competed with Fe for the adsorption of arsenic and protected active iron sites from arsenic occupation. The other side, presence of Mg promoted the formation of MgFe2O4 in view of the strong interactions between Mg and Fe, suppressing the interactions between arsenic and Fe. Instead, gaseous arsenic turned to bond with Mg-O sites. Consequently, surface acid sites and function Fe-OH/ Fe = O bonds were preserved for de-NOx. Moreover, increase of oxygen content and temperature weakened the deactivation of Mg-Ti modified iron-based catalyst by arsenic. It was due to the oxidation of As2O3 with oxygen content increase and the strengthened reactivity of non-active iron sites with arsenic and Mg with arsenic as temperature elevation, inhibiting the interactions between active iron sites with arsenic.
Keywords:Arsenic;SCR of NOx;Mg;Ti;γ-Fe2O3 catalyst
  1. Burch R, Breen JP, Meunier FC, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 39(4), 283 (2002)
  2. Roy B, Choo WL, Bhattacharya S, Fuel, 114, 135 (2013)
  3. Bejarano CA, Jia CQ, Chung KH, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 800 (2001)
  4. Liu Y, Guo R, Duan C, Wu G, Miao Y, Gu J, Pan W, Fuel, 271 (2020)
  5. Parvulescu VI, Grange P, Delmon B, Catal. Today, 46(4), 233 (1998)
  6. Busca G, Lietti L, Ramis G, Berti F, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 18(1-2), 1 (1998)
  7. Liu X, Cao Y, Yan N, Ma C, Cao L, Guo P, Tian P, Liu Z, Chinese J. Catal., 41, 1715 (2020)
  8. Shan W, Yu Y, Zhang Y, He G, Peng Y, Li J, He H, Catal. Today. (2020).
  9. Casagrande L, Lietti L, Nova I, Forzatti P, Baiker A, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 22(1), 63 (1999)
  10. REn D, Gui K, Gu S, Mol. Catal., 502 (2021)
  11. Kim DH, Kwon DW, Hong SC, Appl. Surf. Sci., 538 (2021)
  12. Lietti L, Forzatti P, Bregani F, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(11), 3884 (1996)
  13. Wu Y, Zhou X, Mi T, Hu B, Liu J, Lu Q, Mol. Catal., 499 (2021)
  14. Alemany LJ, Lietti L, Ferlazzo N, Forzatti P, Busca G, Giamello E, Bregani F, J. Catal., 155(1), 117 (1995)
  15. Nicosia D, Czekaj I, Krocher O, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 77(3-4), 228 (2008)
  16. Guo K, Ji J, Osuga R, Zhu Y, Sun J, Tang C, Kondo JN, Dong L, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 287 (2021)
  17. Ramis G, Yi L, Busca G, Turco M, Kotur E, Willey RJ, J. Catal., 157, 523 (1995)
  18. Long RQ, Yang RT, J. Catal., 207(2), 158 (2002)
  19. Larrubia MA, Ramis C, Busca G, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 30(1-2), 101 (2001)
  20. Yu Y, Tan W, An D, Wang X, Liu A, Zou W, Tang C, Ge C, Tong Q, Sun J, Dong L, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 281 (2021)
  21. Qu W, Chen Y, Huang Z, Gao J, Zhou M, Chen J, Li C, Ma Z, Chen J, Tang X, Environ. Sci. Technol. Let., 4, 246 (2017)
  22. Ren D, Gui K, Su S, Wei Y, J. Alloy. Compd., 867 (2021)
  23. Liang H, Gui K, Zha XB, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 94(9), 1668 (2016)
  24. Chen J, Qu W, Chen Y, Liu X, Jiang X, Wang H, Zong Y, Ma Z, Tang X, Chemcatchem., 10, 4683 (2018)
  25. Xu L, Niu S, Wang D, Lu C, Zhang Q, Zhang K, Li J, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 63, 391 (2018)
  26. Xu LT, Niu SL, Lu CM, Zhang Q, Li J, Fuel, 219, 248 (2018)
  27. Xu L, Niu S, Lu C, Wang D, Zhang K, Li J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(5), 1576 (2017)
  28. Nakajima F, Hamada I, Catal. Today, 29(1-4), 109 (1996)
  29. Benson SA, Laumb JD, Crocker CR, Pavlish JH, Fuel Process. Technol., 86(5), 577 (2005)
  30. Zheng YJ, Jensen AD, Johnsson JE, Thogersen JR, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 83(3-4), 186 (2008)
  31. Peng Y, Li J, Si W, Luo J, Wang Y, Fu J, Li X, Crittenden J, Hao J, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 168-169, 195 (2015)
  32. Xu L, Wang C, Chang H, Wu Q, Zhang T, Li J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 7064 (2018)
  33. Senior CL, Lignell DO, Sarofim AF, Mehta A, Combust. Flame., 147, 209 (2006)
  34. Peng Y, Li J, Si W, Luo J, Dai Q, Luo X, Liu X, Hao J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13895 (2014)
  35. Peng Y, Si WZ, Li X, Luo JM, Li JH, Crittenden J, Hao JM, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 181, 692 (2016)
  36. Lu Q, Pei X, Wu Y, Xu M, Liu D, Zhao L, Energ. Fuel., 34, 4865 (2020)
  37. Hu WS, Gao X, Deng YW, Qu RY, Zheng CH, Zhu XB, Cen KF, Chem. Eng. J., 293, 118 (2016)
  38. Zhang Y, Wang C, Li W, Liu H, Zhang Y, Hack P, Pan W, Energ. Fuel., 29, 6578 (2015)
  39. Yu S, Zhang C, Ma L, Fang Q, Chen G, Chem. Eng. J. (2020).
  40. Zhang Y, Liu J, Energ. Fuel., 33, 1414 (2019)
  41. Zhang H, Kong M, Cai Z, Liu Q, Zeng J, Duan M, Yang J, Ren S, Li J, ACS Omega., 5, 24195 (2020)
  42. Li X, Li J, Peng Y, Si W, He X, Hao J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 9971 (2015)
  43. Wu CY, Biswas P, Combust. Flame, 93, 31 (1993)
  44. Chesworth S, Yang G, Chang DPY, Jones AD, Kelly PB, Kennedy IM, Combust. Flame, 98, 259 (1994)
  45. Helsen L, Van den Bulck E, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 2931 (2000)
  46. Yu S, Zhang C, Ma L, Fang Q, Chen G, Chem. Eng. J. (2020).
  47. Yu S, Zhang C, Ma L, Tan P, Fang Q, Chen G, J. Hazard. Mater., 403 (2021)
  48. Hao X, Cheng Z, Chang-le Y, Sheng-hui Y, Quan L, Qing-yan F, Gang C, J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 47, 876 (2019)
  49. Hums E, Res. Chem. Intermed., 19, 419 (1993)
  50. Li X, Li XS, Li JH, Hao JM, J. Hazard. Mater., 318, 615 (2016)
  51. Li Y, Wan Y, Li Y, Zhan S, Guan Q, Tian Y, A.C.S. Appl, Mater. Interfaces., 8, 5224 (2016)
  52. Li X, Li JH, Peng Y, Chang HZ, Zhang T, Zhao S, Si WZ, Hao JM, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 184, 246 (2016)
  53. Liu CX, Yang SJ, Ma L, Peng Y, Hamidreza A, Chang HZ, Li JH, Catal. Lett., 143(7), 697 (2013)
  54. NIST X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Database, Version 4.1 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, 2012.
  55. Parikh SJ, Chorover J, Langmuir, 22(20), 8492 (2006)
  56. Yang X, Wang X, Feng Y, Zhang G, Wang T, Song W, Shu C, Jiang L, Wang C, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 473 (2013)
  57. KumarMaji S, Mukherjee N, Mondal A, Adhikary B, Polyhedron., 33, 145 (2012)
  58. Mehdizadeh R, Saghatforoush LA, Sanati S, Superlattice. Microst., 52, 92 (2012)
  59. Ardelean I, Toderas M, Pascuta P, Mod. Phys. Lett. B., 17, 1175 (2003)