화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Clean Technology, Vol.26, No.3, 161-167, September, 2020
DOI10.7464/ksct.2020.26.3.161  Export Citation
2-Butanol, 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane, Methylcyclohexane 그리고 Toluene 이성분 혼합계에 대한 101.3 kPa에서의 인화점 측정
Measurement of Flash Point for Binary Mixtures of 2-Butanol, 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane, Methylcyclohexane, and Toluene at 101.3 kPa
황인찬, 인세진†
  • 우송대학교 소방안전학부, 34606 대전광역시 동구 동대전로 171 우송대학교 소방방재학과
In Chan Hwang, and Se Jin In†
  • Department of Fire and Disaster Protection Engineering, Woosong University, 171 JaYang-Dong, Dong-Gu, Daejeon, 34606 Republic of Korea
E-mail:
초록
가연성 물질을 사용하는 화학공정 산업에서 저장 안전성을 높이고 화재 및 폭발 예방 조치를 설계하려면 신뢰할 수 있는 인화점에 대한 정보가 필요하다. 본 연구는 석유화학 공정에서 중요한 용매와 가솔린의 옥탄가 향상제로 사용되는 방향족, 나프텐 및 파라핀계 탄화수소 화합물과 알킬알코올에 대한 이성분 혼합물의 인화점 데이터를 얻는 것이다. 그래서 이성분 혼합물인 {2-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane}, {2-butanol + methylcyclohexane} 그리고 {2-butanol + toluene} 계에 대한 최소인화점을 Stanhope-Seta 밀폐식 인화점 측정기를 이용하여 측정하였다. 각 이성분계 혼합물에 대한 인화점을 예측하기 위해 이상성인라울의 법칙(Raoult’s law)과 비이상성인 Wilson, NRTL 그리고 UNIQUAC 매개변수를 이용하였고 실험 결과와 비교해 보았다. 이상성을 나타내는 라울의 법칙(Raoult’s law)보다 비이상 용액 혼합물의 활동도 계수 모델에서 2.36 K 이하의 좋은 결과를 나타내었다. 본 연구의 결과는 가연성 혼합물을 함유한 석유화학 용매의 안전한 저장 및 공정 설계에 적용할 수 있다.
For the design of the prevention and mitigation measures in process industries involving flammable substances, reliable safety data are required. An important property used to estimate the risk of fire and explosion for a flammable liquid is the flash point. Flammability is an important factor to consider when developing safe methods for storing and handling solids and liquids. In this study, the flash point data were measured for the binary systems {2-butanol + 2,2,4-trimethylpentane}, {2-butanol + methylcyclohexane} and {2-butanol + toluene} at 101.3 kPa. Experiments were performed according to the standard test method (ASTM D 3278) using a Stanhope-Seta closed cup flash point tester. A minimum flash point behavior was observed in the binary systems as in the many cases for the hydrocarbon and alcohol mixture that were observed. The measured flash points were compared with the predicted values calculated via the following activity coefficient (GE) models: Wilson, Non-Random Two-Liquid (NRTL), and UNIversal QUAsiChemical (UNIQUAC) models. The predicted data were only adequate for the data determined by the closed-cup test method and may not be appropriate for the data obtained from the open-cup test method because of its deviation from the vapor liquid equilibrium. The predicted results of this work can be used to design safe petrochemical processes, such as the identification of safe storage conditions for non-ideal solutions containing flammable components.
Keywords:flash point;SETA closed cup flash point tester;binary mixtures;activity coefficient models;flammable liquid
  1. Lees FP, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK (1996).
  2. Liaw HJ, Gerbaud V, Wu HT, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 55(9), 3451 (2010)
  3. Liaw HJ, Chiu YY, J. Hazard. Mater., 137(1), 38 (2006)
  4. Poor HM, Sadrameli SM, Fluid Phase Equilib., 440, 95 (2017)
  5. da Cunha S, Liaw HJ, Gerbaud V, Fluid Phase Equilib., 452, 113 (2017)
  6. Liaw HJ, Lee YH, Tang CL, Hsu HH, Liu JH, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 15(6), 429 (2002)
  7. Dabelstein W, Reglitzky A, Schutze A, Reders K, Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH (2007).
  8. Vora BV, Kocal JA, Barger PT, Schmidt RJ, Johnson JA, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (2003).
  9. Lawrence F, Springer, Berlin, 45-95 (1990).
  10. Manuel HJ, Dierkes W, “Rapra Review Report on Recycling of Rubber,” 9, report 99 (1997).
  11. Wilson GM, Deal CH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 1(1), 20 (1962)
  12. Renon H, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 14(1), 135 (1968)
  13. Abrams DS, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 21, 116 (1975)
  14. Dortmund Data Bank Software Package (DDBSP), version 2006 professional, Software and Separation Technology GmbH. (http://www.ddbst.de)
  15. National Fire Protection Association, Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA. National Fire Codes, 7 (1985).
  16. American Society for Testing Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 6 (1999).
  17. In SJ, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 32, 327 (2015)
  18. Hwang IC, Kim SW, In SJ, Fire Sci. Eng., 32(1), 1 (2018)
  19. Hwang IC, In SJ, Clean Technol., 25(2), 140 (2019)
  20. Le Chatelier H, Ann Mines, 19, 388 (1891)
  21. Liaw HJ, Tang CL, Lai JS, Combust. Flame, 138(4), 308 (2004)
  22. Poling BE, Prausnitz JM, O’connell JP, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill, N.Y. (2001).
  23. Martınez-Soria V, Pilar-Pena M, Monton JB, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 44(3), 608 (1999)