화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.36, No.6, 929-941, June, 2019
DOI10.1007/s11814-019-0266-2  Export Citation
Optimization and experimental investigation in bottom inlet cyclone separator for performance analysis
Seenivasan Venkatesh†, Murukesan Sakthivel1, Muthukumar Avinasilingam2, Subramanian Gopalsamy3, Eswaran Arulkumar4, and Hari Prasanth Devarajan5
  • Mechanical Engineering, Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, India
  • 1Mechanical Engineering, Anna University Regional Campus, Coimbatore, India
  • 2R&D Department, Rane TRW, India
  • 3R&D Department, Quest Global, India
  • 4R&D Department, Focus-R, India
  • 5Programming Division, Infosys, India
E-mail:
The chemical engineering industries are utilizing the bottom inlet cyclone separator with venturi for separating the particles from an air/gas medium. For improving the performance of this equipment, important geometrical features such as venturi inlet width, total height of the cyclone and body height of the cyclone are considered for optimization. Central composite design was used in response surface methodology (RSM) to fit the regression equation. This regression equation was evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Then, this polynomial equation was optimized by particle swarm optimization (PSO) for minimizing the cut-off diameter. These optimized results were compared with genetic algorithm (GA) results. Based on this optimized result, an experimental setup was created for validation purpose. The experimental results were compared with GA and PSO results. A good agreement was obtained between these results. The magnesium particles were utilized for predicting the cut-off diameter of the new design. The Stokes number of this new design was less when compared with the mathematical model. The new design gives better performance when compared with the mathematical model. The numerical simulation was executed for predicting the particle collection efficiency, cut-off diameter and flow pattern inside the cyclone. The results were compared with the mathematical model and venturi inlet tangential entry cyclone.
Keywords:Mathematical Model;Cut-off Diameter;Response Surface Methodology;Particle Swarm Optimization;Genetic Algorithm;CFD
  1. Peukert W, Wadenpohl C, Powd. Technol., 118, 136 (2001)
  2. Sinnott RK, Chemical engineering design, Elsevier Science, Oxford (2005).
  3. Ray MB, Luning PE, Hoffmann AC, Plomp A, Beumer MIL, Int. J. Miner. Process., 53(1), 39 (1998)
  4. Liu AL, Zhang YH, Ma L, Wang YM, He MY, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35(6), 1380 (2018)
  5. Bernado S, Mori M, Peres AP, Dionisio RP, Powder Technol., 162(3), 190 (2006)
  6. Chuah TG, Gimbun J, Choong TSY, Powder Technol., 162(2), 126 (2006)
  7. Yong-Fa D, Xun L, Ping-Dao G, Hao L, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(3), 879 (2009)
  8. Kim JC, Lee LW, Aerosol. Sci. Technol., 12, 1003 (1990)
  9. Qian FP, Zhang JG, Zhang MY, J. Hazard. Mater., 136(3), 822 (2006)
  10. Jiao JY, Zheng Y, Sun GG, Wang J, Sep. Purif. Technol., 49(2), 157 (2006)
  11. Park Y, Yun CY, Yi J, Kim H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(5), 697 (2005)
  12. Elsayed K, Lacor C, Comput. Fluids., 68, 134 (2012)
  13. Avci A, Karagoz I, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf., 28, 107 (2001)
  14. Zhao BT, Su YX, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 88(5-6A), 606 (2010)
  15. Elsayed K, Lacor C, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(22), 6048 (2010)
  16. Safikhani H, Akhavan-Behabadi MA, Nariman-Zadeh N, Abadi MJM, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89(3A), 301 (2011)
  17. Pishbin S, Moghiman M, Chem. Eng., 2, 686 (2010)
  18. Elsayed K, Lacor C, Powder Technol., 217, 84 (2012)
  19. Martignoni WP, Bernardo S, Quintani CL, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 24, 83 (2007)
  20. Kumar V, Jha K, Sep. Purif. Technol., 215, 25 (2019)
  21. Luciano RD, Silva BL, Rosa LM, Meier HF, Powder Technol., 325, 452 (2018)
  22. Brar LS, Elsayed K, Sep. Purif. Technol., 207, 269 (2018)
  23. Singh P, Couckuyt I, Elsayed K, Deschrijver D, Dhanene T, J. Optim. Theory. Appl., 175, 172 (2017)
  24. Viswanathan S, Chem. Eng. Sci., 53(17), 3161 (1998)
  25. Stairmand CJ, Ind. Eng. Chem., 29, 356 (1951)
  26. Montgomery DC, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 4th Ed, Wi1ey, New York (1997).
  27. Kennedy J, Eberhart R, Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International conference on neural networks, Perth (Australia), 1942 (1995).
  28. Michalevicz Z, Genetic algorithms+data structures=Evolution programs, Springer, New York (1992).
  29. Launder BE, Shima N, AIAA J., 27, 1319 (1989)
  30. Gibson MM, Launder BE, J. Fluid Mech., 86, 491 (1978)
  31. Fu S, Launder BE, Leschziner MA, Modeling strongly swirling recirculating jet flow with reynolds-stress transport closures, Sixth Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Toulouse, France (1987).
  32. Launder BE, Spalding DB, Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 3, 269 (1974)
  33. Fluent, Inc., Fluent 6.1.22 Users’ Guide (2004).
  34. Venkatesh S, Sakthivel M, Desal. Water Treat., 90, 168 (2017)