화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.73, 67-77, May, 2019
DOI10.1016/j.jiec.2018.12.011  Export Citation
A comparative removal of two dyes from aqueous solution using modified oak waste residues: Process optimization using response surface methodology
Samira Samarbaf1, 2, Yaser Tahmasebi Birgani1, 2, Mohsen Yazdani2, 3, and Ali Akbar Babaei1, 2, †
  • 1Environmental Technologies Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • 2Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • 3Student Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
E-mail:
In this study, optimization of adsorptive removal of two cationic (methylene blue (MB)) and anionic (acid red 73 (AR 73)) dyes with modified oak waste (MOW) adsorbent was carried out using response surface ethodology (RSM). The input variables included initial solution pH (2-10), contact time (20-200 min), adsorbent dosage (0.5-2.5 g/L) and initial dyes concentrations (10-90 mg/L). Furthermore, the surfaces of the adsorbent were modified with different modifiers to find the most efficient adsorbent. The obtained results of comparative studies on dyes adsorption confirm that sodium hydroxide, compared to other modifiers, has the highest ability to activate the surfaces of the oak waste (OW) to remove dyes from the solution. Using NaOH, the removal efficiency of MB and that of AR 73 were obtained to be 96% and 29%, respectively. In addition, results of the optimization study showed that RSM could significantly predict the experimental data of dyes removal with a high correlation coefficient (0.991 for MB and 0.993 for AR 73). The optimum experimental conditions for dyes removal were pH of 6.2, 160 min contact time, 2.0 g/L adsorbent dosage and 70 mg/L initial dye concentrations. Under this condition, the removal efficiency for MB and AR 73 reached 85.36% and 41.27%, respectively. Ultimately, from the findings of this study, it is observed that MOW can be used as an efficient and cost-effective adsorbent for the removal of dyes from the contaminated aqueous solution.
Keywords:Acid red;73;Methylene blue;Oak waste;Central composite design
  1. Mittal A, Mittal J, Malviya A, Kaur D, Gupta VK, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 342(2), 518 (2010)
  2. Saravanan R, Thirumal E, Gupta V, Narayanan V, Stephen A, J. Mol. Liq., 177, 394 (2013)
  3. Mittal A, Kurup L, Gupta VK, J. Hazard. Mater., 117(2-3), 171 (2005)
  4. Gupta VK, Jain R, Varshney S, J. Hazard. Mater., 142(1-2), 443 (2007)
  5. Jain AK, Gupta VK, Jain S, Suhas, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1195 (2004)
  6. Gupta VK, Rastogi A, Nayak A, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 342(1), 135 (2010)
  7. Goyal RN, Gupta VK, Oyama M, Bachheti N, Talanta, 71, 1110 (2007)
  8. Gupta VK, Srivastava S, Tyagi R, Water Res., 34, 1543 (2000)
  9. Gupta VK, Jain R, Mittal A, Mathur M, Sikarwar S, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 309(2), 464 (2007)
  10. Gupta VK, Sharma S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42(25), 6619 (2003)
  11. Gupta VK, Mittal A, Kurup L, Mittal J, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 304(1), 52 (2006)
  12. Gupta VK, Jain R, Varshney S, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 312(2), 292 (2007)
  13. Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 49(1), 1 (2004)
  14. Akpan UG, Hameed BH, J. Hazard. Mater., 170(2-3), 520 (2009)
  15. Mittal A, Mittal J, Malviya A, Gupta VK, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 340(1), 16 (2009)
  16. Biswas MM, Taylor KE, Bewtra JK, Biswas N, Water Environ. Res., 79, 351 (2007)
  17. Chandro S, Nagaraja T, Med. J. Armed Forces India, 43, 291 (1987)
  18. Gupta S, Sundarrajan M, Rao K, Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen., 23, 301 (2003)
  19. Mohan SV, Rao NC, Karthikeyan J, J. Hazard. Mater., 90(2), 189 (2002)
  20. Mohan SV, Ramanaiah S, Sarma P, Biochem. Eng. J., 38, 61 (2008)
  21. Mittal A, Mittal J, Malviya A, Gupta VK, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 344(2), 497 (2010)
  22. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Agarwal S, Tyagi I, Gupta VK, RSC Adv., 5, 18438 (2015)
  23. Kobya M, Can OT, Bayramoglu M, J. Hazard. Mater., 100(1-3), 163 (2003)
  24. Papic S, Koprivanac N, Bozic AL, Metes A, Dyes Pigment., 62, 291 (2004)
  25. Meric S, Selcuk H, Belgiorno V, Water Res., 39, 1147 (2005)
  26. Mohammadi N, Khani H, Gupta VK, Amereh E, Agarwal S, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 362(2), 457 (2011)
  27. Robati D, Mirza B, Rajabi M, Moradi O, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Gupta VK, Chem. Eng. J., 284, 687 (2016)
  28. Ju DJ, Byun IG, Park JJ, Lee CH, Ahn GH, Park TJ, Bioresour. Technol., 99(17), 7971 (2008)
  29. Das SK, Ghosh P, Ghosh I, Guha AK, Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 65, 30 (2008)
  30. Hameed BH, Mahmoud DK, Ahmad AL, J. Hazard. Mater., 158(1), 65 (2008)
  31. Ornek A, Ozacar M, Sengil IA, Biochem. Eng. J., 37, 192 (2007)
  32. Unuabonah EI, Adebowale KO, Dawodu FA, J. Hazard. Mater., 157(2-3), 397 (2008)
  33. Oladoja NA, Aboluwoye CO, Oladimeji YB, Ashogbon AO, Otemuyiwa IO, Desalination, 227(1-3), 190 (2008)
  34. Saleh TA, Gupta VK, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 371, 101 (2012)
  35. Gupta V, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 2313 (2009)
  36. Gupta V, Ali I, Saini V, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 4012 (2004)
  37. Gupta V, Ali I, Saini V, Water Res., 41, 3317 (2007)
  38. Gupta VK, Ali I, Saini VK, Van Gerven T, Van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(10), 3655 (2005)
  39. Gupta V, Carrott P, Carrott MR, Suhas, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 783 (2009)
  40. Gupta VK, Mittal A, Gajbe V, Mittal J, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 319(1), 30 (2008)
  41. Gupta VK, Rastogi A, Dwivedi MK, Mohan D, Sep. Sci. Technol., 32(17), 2883 (1997)
  42. Gupta VK, Ali I, Water Res., 35, 33 (2001)
  43. Gupta VK, Ali I, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 766 (2008)
  44. Gupta VK, Ali I, Suhas, Saini VK, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 299(2), 556 (2006)
  45. Gupta VK, Jain C, Ali I, Chandra S, Agarwal S, Water Res., 36, 2483 (2002)
  46. Gupta VK, Mohan D, Sharma S, Park KT, Environmentalist, 19, 129 (1998)
  47. Gupta VK, Sharma S, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3612 (2002)
  48. Jain AK, Gupta VK, Bhatnagar A, Suhas, J. Hazard. Mater., 101(1), 31 (2003)
  49. Mittal A, Gupta VK, Malviya A, Mittal J, J. Hazard. Mater., 151(2-3), 821 (2008)
  50. Mittal A, Kaur D, Malviya A, Mittal J, Gupta VK, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 337(2), 345 (2009)
  51. Hameed BH, Krishni RR, Sata SA, J. Hazard. Mater., 162(1), 305 (2009)
  52. Arami M, Limaee NY, Mahmoodi NM, Tabrizi NS, J. Hazard. Mater., 135(1-3), 171 (2006)
  53. Mondal M, J. Environ. Manage., 90, 3266 (2009)
  54. Esfahani AR, Firouzi AF, Sayyad G, Kiasat A, Alidokht L, Khataee A, Res. Chem. Intermed., 40, 431 (2014)
  55. Asfaram A, Ghaedi M, Hajati S, Goudarzi A, Bazrafshan AA, Spectroc. Acta Pt. A-Molec. Biomolec. Spectr., 145, 203 (2015)
  56. Esfahani AR, Hojati S, Azimi A, Farzadian M, Khataee A, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 49, 172 (2015)
  57. Kakavandi B, Jahangiri-rad M, Rafiee M, Esfahani AR, Babaei AA, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 231, 192 (2016)
  58. Khataee A, Environ. Technol., 30, 1155 (2009)
  59. Khataee A, Zarei M, Dehghan G, Ebadi E, Pourhassan M, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng., 42, 380 (2011)
  60. Babaei AA, Alavi SN, Akbarifar M, Ahmadi K, Esfahani AR, Kakavandi B, Desalin. Water Treat., 57, 27199 (2016)
  61. Ghosh D, Bhattacharyya KG, Appl. Clay Sci., 20, 295 (2002)
  62. Sohrabnezhad S, Pourahmad A, Desalination, 256(1-3), 84 (2010)
  63. Rida K, Bouraoui S, Hadnine S, Appl. Clay Sci., 83, 99 (2013)