화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.35, No.5, 1073-1082, May, 2018
Hydrodynamics and design of gas distributor in large-scale amine absorbers using computational fluid dynamics
E-mail:
A gas phase three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed to investigate the hydrodynamics of gas distributors used in an amine absorber with a diameter of 3.2m. A standard gas inlet, tubular injectors with short, medium and long lengths, and a Schoepentoeter were considered as feed systems of the gas distributors. The pressure drop, dead-area ratio and coefficient of distribution at the packing entry were used as the performance indexes of the gas distributors. The down-pipe as a liquid collector exhibited a lower dead-area ratio when compared with that of the down-comer. The tubular gas injector with a short length reduced the dead-area ratio and the gas maldistribution. The Schoepentoeter was associated with the lowest pressure drop, dead-area ratio, and coefficient of distribution among the gas distributors. The uniformity of gas distribution was enhanced by 25% in the Schoepentoeter when compared to that of the tubular gas injector.
  1. Mondal MK, Balsora HK, Varshney P, Energy, 46(1), 431 (2012)
  2. Wang M, Lawal A, Stephenson P, Sidders J, Ramshaw C, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89(9A), 1609 (2011)
  3. Lee JH, Kwak NS, Lee IY, Jang KR, Lee DW, Jang SG, Kim BK, Shim JG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(5), 800 (2015)
  4. Zaman M, Lee JH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(8), 1497 (2013)
  5. Aroonwilas A, Chakma A, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Veawab A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 58(17), 4037 (2003)
  6. Wehrli M, Hirschberg S, Schweizer R, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 81(1), 116 (2003)
  7. Petrova T, Vaklieva-Bancheva N, Darakchiev S, Popov R, Clean Technol. Environ., 16, 1381 (2014)
  8. Gorak A, Olujic Z, Distillation: Equipment and Processes, Academic Press, London (2014).
  9. Olujic Z, Ali AM, Jansens PJ, Chem. Eng. Process., 43, 465 (2004)
  10. Billingham JF, Bonaquist DP, Lockett MJ, Ins. Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, 142, 841 (1997)
  11. Dhotre MT, Joshi JB, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 81(3-4), 677 (2003)
  12. Petrova T, Semkov K, Dodev C, Chem. Eng. Process., 42(11), 931 (2003)
  13. Dhotre MT, Joshi JB, Chem. Eng. J., 125(3), 149 (2007)
  14. Edwards DP, Krishnamurthy KR, Potthoff RW, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 77(7), 656 (1999)
  15. Darakchiev R, Dodev C, Chem. Eng. Process., 41(5), 385 (2002)
  16. Stemich C, Spiegel L, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89(8A), 1392 (2011)
  17. Mosca G, Schaeffer P, Griepsma B, Sulzer Technical Review, 3, 6 (2010)
  18. Kim J, Pham DA, Lim YI, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 121, 99 (2017)
  19. Ali AM, Jansens PJ, Olujic Z, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 81(1), 108 (2003)
  20. Zarei T, Abedini E, Rahimi R, Khorshidi J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(4), 969 (2017)
  21. Chen S, Fan YP, Yan ZH, Wang W, Liu XH, Lu CX, Chem. Eng. Sci., 153, 58 (2016)
  22. Ngo SI, Lim YI, Song BH, Lee UD, Lee JW, Song JH, Powder Technol., 275, 188 (2015)
  23. Ngo SI, Lim YI, Hahn MH, Jung J, Bang YH, Comput. Chem. Eng., 103, 58 (2017)
  24. Pham HH, Lim YI, Cho CH, Bang YH, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 128, 192 (2017)
  25. Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J, Comput. Fluids, 24, 227 (1995)
  26. Kim MI, Lee Y, Kim BW, Lee DH, Song WS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(2), 359 (2009)
  27. Olujic Z, Chinese J. Chem. Eng., 19, 726 (2011)