화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.59, 304-309, March, 2018
Switchable hydrophilicity solvents for carbon dioxide chemical absorption
E-mail:
The development of more efficient solvents for carbon dioxide capture is the main aim of present work by using a gas.liquid.liquid (GLL) reactor. This type of reactor is based on the use of switchable hydrophilicity solvents. This type of solvents tries to maintain a constant driving force and decreasing the amount of solvent to be regenerated. N-ethylpiperidine solvent shows an increase in absorption rate in GLL configuration and reduce the costs of regeneration in a 30%. Triethylamine solvent shows worst results in absorption tests and it suffers high degradation. The use of bicarbonate separation by precipitation for solvent regeneration contributes suitable results.
  1. Mumford KA, Smith KH, Anderson CJ, Shen SF, Tao WD, Suryaputradinata YA, Qader A, Hooper B, Innocenzi RA, Kentish SE, Stevens GW, Energy Fuels, 26(1), 138 (2012)
  2. Wang M, Joel AS, Ramshaw C, Eimer D, Musa NM, Appl. Energy, 158, 275 (2015)
  3. Li BY, Duan YH, Luebke D, Morreale B, Appl. Energy, 102, 1439 (2013)
  4. Makino T, Umecky T, Kanakubo M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55(50), 12949 (2016)
  5. Hu PC, Zhang R, Liu ZC, Liu HY, Xu CM, Meng XH, Liang M, Liang SS, Energy Fuels, 29(9), 6019 (2015)
  6. Luo X, Liu S, Gao HX, Liao HY, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Liang ZW, Sep. Purif. Technol., 169, 279 (2016)
  7. Garcia-Abuin A, Gomez-Diaz D, Navaza JM, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(4), 2272 (2014)
  8. He FJ, Wang T, Fang MX, Wang Z, Yu H, Ma QH, Energy Fuels, 31(1), 770 (2017)
  9. Vaidya PD, Kenig EY, Chem. Eng. Technol., 30(11), 1467 (2007)
  10. Hook RJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(5), 1779 (1997)
  11. Durelle J, Vanderveen JR, Jessop PG, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16, 5270 (2014)
  12. Xiong D, Cui G, Wang J, Wang H, Li Z, Yao K, Zhang S, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit., 54, 7265 (2015)
  13. Yilmaz E, Soylak M, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 30, 1629 (2015)
  14. Ye Q, Wang X, Lu Y, J. Int, Greenh. Gas Control, 39, 205 (2015)
  15. Xu Z, Wang S, Qi G, Liu J, Zhao B, Chen C, Oil Gas Sci. Technol., 69, 851 (2014)
  16. Fan GJ, Wee AGH, Idem R, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(5), 2717 (2009)
  17. Garcia-Abuin A, Go’mez-Diaz D, Lo’pez AB, Navaza JM, Rumbo A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, 13432 (2013)
  18. Linek V, Sinkule J, Havelka P, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33(11), 2731 (1994)
  19. Dumont E, Andres Y, Le Cloirec P, Biochem. Eng. J., 30, 245 (2006)
  20. da Silva TL, Calado V, Silva N, Mendes RL, Alves SS, Vasconcelos JMT, Reis A, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 11, 245 (2006)
  21. Galindo P, Schaffer A, Brechtel K, Unterberger S, Scheffknecht G, Fuel, 101, 2 (2012)
  22. Gao HX, Liang ZW, Liao HY, Idem RO, Chem. Eng. Sci., 135, 330 (2015)
  23. Pouladi B, Hassankiadeh MN, Behroozshad F, Energy Rep., 2, 54 (2016)
  24. Feng B, Du M, Dennis TJ, Anthony K, Perumal MJ, Energy Fuels, 24, 213 (2010)