A comprehensive reactivity study of nanojars toward 18 different acidic compounds with varying pK(a), including 12 different carboxylic acids (both aliphatic and aromatic mono- and dicarboxylic acids), p-toluenesulfonic acid, hydrogen sulfate, hydrogen carbonate, carbonic acid, 1-decanethiol, and methanol, as well as four different conjugate bases (formate, acetate, benzoate, 2-bromoethanesulfonate) is carried out with the aid of electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry. Thus, the effect on nanojar substitution and breakdown pattern of a number of variables, such as concentration of reagent (acid or conjugate base), acidity of reagent (pK(a)), effect of acid vs conjugate base, steric effects, aromaticity, incarcerated anion and size of the nanojar, is evaluated. Of the substitution and breakdown products identified by mass spectrometry, acetate-substituted nanojars (Bu4N)(2)[CO3 subset of{Cu-27(mu-OH)(27)(mu-pz)(27-x)(mu-CH3COO)(x)}] (x = 1 and 2), as well as dimeric complexes (Bu4N)(2)[Cu-2(mu-pz)(2)A(2)] (A = CO32- and SO42-) have been isolated and characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. This study offers a detailed understanding of the behavior of nanojars of various sizes and with different incarcerated anions in the presence of the above-mentioned compounds at varying concentrations and tests the limits of the pyrazolate/carboxylate structural analogy in multinuclear metal complexes. The results point to the possibility of obtaining functionalized nanojars via pyrazolate/carboxylate ligand exchange, an aid in the design of anion extraction processes using nanojars or similar complexes as extracting agents.