화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Materials Research, Vol.27, No.2, 107-112, February, 2017
Simulated Study on the Effects of Substrate Thickness and Minority-Carrier Lifetime in Back Contact and Back Junction Si Solar Cells
E-mail:
The BCBJ (Back Contact and Back Junction) or back-lit solar cell design eliminates shading loss by placing the pn junction and metal electrode contacts all on one side that faces away from the sun. However, as the electron-hole generation sites now are located very far from the pn junction, loss by minority-carrier recombination can be a significant issue. Utilizing Medici, a 2-dimensional semiconductor device simulation tool, the interdependency between the substrate thickness and the minority-carrier recombination lifetime was studied in terms of how these factors affect the solar cell power output. Qualitatively speaking, the results indicate that a very high quality substrate with a long recombination lifetime is needed to maintain the maximum power generation. The quantitative value of the recombination lifetime of minority-carriers, i.e., electrons in p-type substrates, required in the BCBJ cell is about one order of magnitude longer than that in the front-lit cell, i.e., 5 × 10-4 sec vs. 5 × 10-5 sec. Regardless of substrate thickness up to 150 μm, the power output in the BCBJ cell stays at nearly the maximum value of about 1.8 × 10-2 W·cm-2, or 18 mW·cm-2, as long as the recombination lifetime is 5 × 10-4 s or longer. The output power, however, declines steeply to as low as 10 mW·cm-2 when the recombination lifetime becomes significantly shorter than 5 × 10-4 sec. Substrate thinning is found to be not as effective as in the front-lit case in stemming the decline in the output power. In view of these results, for BCBJ applications, the substrate needs to be only mono-crystalline Si of very high quality. This bars the use of poly-crystalline Si, which is gaining wider acceptance in standard front-lit solar cells.
  1. Green MA, Emery K, King DL, Hishikawa Y, Warta W, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl., 15, 35 (2007)
  2. Kim JH, Chu MJ, Chung YD, Park RM, Sung HK, Electron. Telecommun. Trend Anal., 23, 2 (2008)
  3. SunPower A-300 Cell, SunPower Corp., San Jose, CA, USA (2005).
  4. Medici Two-Dimensional Device Simulation Program, Ver. 2.2, User’s Manual, vol. 3, Technology Modeling Associates, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, Jun. 1996, pp. 7.1-7.10.
  5. Choe KS, Solid State Sci., 12, 1948 (2010)
  6. Choe KS, Korean J. Mater. Res., 25(9), 487 (2015)