화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.28, 73-77, August, 2015
Recovery of tungsten from spent selective catalytic reduction catalysts by pressure leaching
E-mail:
The recovery and purification of vanadium (V) and tungsten (W) from honeycomb-type spent selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst was investigated using an autoclave through a pressure leaching process. Spent SCR catalyst mainly consists of TiO2 and other oxides (7.73% WO3, 1.23% V2O5, etc.). The reaction temperature, NaOH concentration, time, additive concentration, and liquid.solid (L/S) ratio were varied during the leaching process. The optimal reaction conditions were identified for recovery of V and W. The addition of NaOH to Na2CO3 improved the amount of V and W recovered because of the enhancing effect of NaOH in Na2CO3. As the concentration of CaCl2 was increased during the precipitation process in order to separate the recovered V and W, the precipitation percentages of V and W increased, respectively. However, the use of Ca(OH)2 as the additive reduced the precipitation percentage of W. Therefore, despite full precipitation of V (98.6%), only 7.73% of W was precipitated when 3 equivalents of Ca(OH)2 was reacted with spent SCR catalyst for 30 min. The remaining W in the leaching solution was reacted with NH4OH to form ammonium tungstate, which was converted to ammonium paratungstate through evaporation. Consequently, V and W could be recovered and separated successfully through the process in this study.
  1. Forzatti P, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 222(1-2), 221 (2001)
  2. http://www.kores.net.
  3. Chen Y, Feng QM, Shao YH, Zhang GF, Ou LM, Lu YP, Int. J. Miner. Process., 79(1), 42 (2006)
  4. Gomez-Bueno CO, Spink DR, Rempel GL, Metall. Mater. Trans. B-Proc. Metall. Mater. Proc. Sci., 12B, 341 (1981)
  5. Gupta CK, Krishnamurthy N, Extractive Metallurgy of Vanadium, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 1992.
  6. Hairunnisha S, Sendil GK, Rethinaraj JP, Srinivasan GN, Adaikkalam P, Kulandaisamy S, Hydrometallurgy, 85, 67 (2007)
  7. Kar BB, Datta P, Misra VN, Hydrometallurgy, 72, 87 (2004)
  8. Luo L, Miyazaki T, Shibayama A, Yen W, Fujita T, Miner. Eng., 16(7), 665 (2003)
  9. Luo L, Kejun L, Shibayama A, Yen W, Fujita T, Shindo O, Katai A, Hydrometallurgy, 72, 1 (2004)
  10. Mohanty M, Rath PC, Bhattacharya IN, Paramguru RK, Miner. Proc. Extr. Metall., 120(1), 56 (2011)
  11. Paulino JF, Afonso JC, Mantovano JL, Vianna CA, Cunha JWSDD, Hydrometallurgy, 127-128, 121 (2012)
  12. Queneau PB, Huggins DK, Beckstead LW, US Patent 4,320,096 (1982).
  13. Redkin AF, Kostromin NP, Geochem. Int., 48, 1049 (2010)
  14. Wood SA, Vlassopoulos D, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 53, 303 (1989)
  15. Shlewit H, Alibrahim M, Fuel, 85(5-6), 878 (2006)
  16. Zeng L, Cheng CY, Hydrometallurgy, 98, 1 (2009)
  17. Zhao Z, Li J, Wang S, Li H, Liu M, Sun P, Li L, Hydrometallurgy, 108, 152 (2011)
  18. Gao F, Yan W, Li Y, Shi M, Zhou Z, Huang D, J. Chin. Chem. Soc., 39, 1423 (2011)
  19. Meher SN, Padhi BK, Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 1, 41 (2011)
  20. Free ML, Hydrometallurgy: Fundamentals and Applications, Wiley-TMS, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  21. Chen H, Wang H, Yang L, Xiao Y, Zheng M, Liu Y, Fu H, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 7, 4889 (2012)
  22. Deng CJ, Zhou L, Zhu HX, Ding J, Yuan WJ, Mater. Sci. Eng., 18, 1 (2011)
  23. Kim HR, Lee JY, Kim JS, J. Korean Inst. Resour. Recycl., 21, 65 (2012)
  24. Wiewioroski EI, US Patent 4,666,685 (1987).
  25. Zhao Z, Liang Y, Li H, Int. J. Refract. Hard Met., 29, 289 (2011)
  26. Padilla R, Sohn HY, Metall. Mater. Trans. B-Proc. Metall. Mater. Proc. Sci., 16, 707 (1985)
  27. Baumgartner SJ, Groot DR, J. S. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall., 114, 331 (2014)
  28. Khorfan S, Wahoud A, Reda Y, Polytech. Ser. Chem. Eng., 45, 131 (2001)
  29. Osseo-Asare K, Metall. Mater. Trans. B-Proc. Metall. Mater. Proc. Sci., 13, 555 (1982)
  30. Liu WP, Xu H, Yang XY, Shi XC, Miner. Eng., 24(14), 1580 (2011)