화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.32, No.12, 2434-2442, December, 2015
DOI10.1007/s11814-015-0077-z  Export Citation
Hybrid membranes with low permeability for vanadium redox flow batteries using in situ sol-gel process
Su Mi Park, and Haekyoung Kim†
  • School of Materials Science & Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280, Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 712-749, Korea
E-mail:
Vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) have been researched as large energy storage systems due to their long cycle life, high energy efficiency, low cost, and flexible design. However, cation exchange membranes are permeable to the vanadium ions in aqueous acidic electrolyte, and vanadium ions crossover reduces the efficiency and capacity of VRFBs. To improve membrane selectivity, proton conducting inorganic materials are proposed for the modification of conventional membranes, e.g., Nafion. Clusters inside Nafion membrane are filled with inorganic materials using in situ sol-gel processes, and this results in homogeneous distribution of inorganic materials. Hybrid membranes with Nafion 115 (coded as HN115) exhibit comparable ionic conductivity and a 70% reduced permeability to vanadium ions compared with pristine Nafion 115 (coded as N115). The columbic and energy efficiencies of VRFBs with HN115 at 20mA.cm.2 exhibit higher values of 95% and 80% in their columbic and energy efficiencies, respectively; VRFBs with N115 exhibit 78% and 70%, respectively. The capacity performance is also improved when HN115 is used in VRFBs. The VRFBs with hybrid membranes (lower permeable membrane) show higher columbic efficiency than the VRFB with N115. HN115 exhibit similar columbic efficiency values of 95% over entire current ranges, which are almost unrelated to the current density. However, N115 shows a fluctuating and lower columbic efficiency of 75%, 88%, 93% at 20mA.cm.2, 40mA.cm.2, 80mA.cm.2, respectively. VRFB with N115 (high conductive membrane) exhibits lower voltage drops for discharging and higher energy efficiency at high current ranges. With these results, it is proposed that the energy efficiencies of VRFBs are compromised with membrane conductivity and permeability. The columbic efficiencies are more contributed by membrane permeability. The permeability properties are more dominant in low current density and the ionic conductivity is more effective in high current ranges. To obtain higher performance of VRFBs, the membrane design for selectivity should be considered according to the operation conditions.
Keywords:Hybrid Membrane;Vanadium Redox Flow Battery;Inorganic Proton Conductor;Vanadium Permeability;Efficiencies
  1. Menictas C, Skyllas-Kazacos M, J. Appl. Electrochem., 41(10), 1223 (2011)
  2. de Leon CP, Frias-Ferrer A, Gonzalez-Garcia J, Szanto DA, Walsh FC, J. Power Sources, 160(1), 716 (2006)
  3. Yang ZG, Zhang JL, Kintner-Meyer MCW, Lu XC, Choi DW, Lemmon JP, Liu J, Chem. Rev., 111(5), 3577 (2011)
  4. Armaroli N, Balzani V, Energy Environ. Sci., 4, 3193 (2011)
  5. Kear G, Shah AA, Walsh FC, Int. J. Energy Res., 36(11), 1105 (2012)
  6. Parasuraman A, Lim TM, Menictas C, Skyllas-Kazacos M, Electrochim. Acta, 101, 27 (2013)
  7. Luo XL, Lu ZZ, Xi JY, Wu ZH, Zhu WT, Chen LQ, Qiu XP, J. Phys. Chem. B, 109(43), 20310 (2005)
  8. Yao C, Zhang HM, Liu T, Li XF, Liu ZH, J. Power Sources, 237, 19 (2013)
  9. Wang N, Peng S, Li Y, Wang H, Liu S, Liu Y, J. Solid State Electrochem., 16, 2169 (2012)
  10. Kim S, Yan J, Schwenzer B, Zhang J, Li L, Liu J, Yang Z, Hickner M, Electrochem. Commun., 12, 1650 (2010)
  11. Kim S, Tighe TB, Schwenzer B, Yan JL, Zhang JL, Liu J, Yang ZG, Hickner MA, J. Appl. Electrochem., 41(10), 1201 (2011)
  12. Ling X, Jia C, Liu J, Yan C, J. Membr. Sci., 415-416, 306 (2012)
  13. Chen D, Kim S, Li L, Yang G, Hickner MA, RSC Adv., 2, 8087 (2012)
  14. Pan JJ, Wang SJ, Xiao M, Hickner M, Meng YZ, J. Membr. Sci., 443, 19 (2013)
  15. Wang NF, Yu JG, Zhou Z, Fang D, Liu SQ, Liu YN, J. Membr. Sci., 437, 114 (2013)
  16. Fujimoto C, Kim S, Stains R, Wei X, Li L, Yang Z, Electrochem. Commun., 20, 48 (2012)
  17. Jung MJ, Parrondo J, Arges CG, Ramani V, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 10458 (2013)
  18. Zhang S, Zhang B, Xing D, Jian X, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1, 12246 (2013)
  19. Mai Z, Zhang H, Zhang H, Xu W, Wei W, Na H, Li X, ChemSusChem, 6, 328 (2013)
  20. Chen D, Hickner MA, Agar E, Kumbur EC, Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 5, 7559 (2013)
  21. Xi J, Wu Z, Teng X, Zhao Y, Chen L, Qiu X, J. Mater. Chem., 18, 1232 (2008)
  22. Teng XG, Zhao YT, Xi JY, Wu ZH, Qiu XP, Chen LQ, J. Membr. Sci., 341(1-2), 149 (2009)
  23. Teng XG, Zhao YT, Xi JY, Wu ZH, Qiu XP, Chen LQ, J. Power Sources, 189(2), 1240 (2009)
  24. Mai ZS, Zhang HM, Li XF, Xiao SH, Zhang HZ, J. Power Sources, 196(13), 5737 (2011)
  25. Wang N, Peng S, Lu D, Liu S, Liu Y, Huang K, J. Solid State Chem., 16, 1577 (2012)
  26. Teng XG, Dai JC, Su J, Zhu YM, Liu HP, Song ZG, J. Power Sources, 240, 131 (2013)
  27. Teng XG, Sun C, Dai JC, Liu HP, Su J, Li FQ, Electrochim. Acta, 88, 725 (2013)
  28. Li ZH, Xi JY, Zhou HP, Liu L, Wu ZH, Qiu XP, Chen LQ, J. Power Sources, 237, 132 (2013)
  29. Kim H, Chang H, J. Membr. Sci., 288(1-2), 188 (2007)
  30. Yang LJ, Tang BB, Wu PY, J. Membr. Sci., 467, 236 (2014)
  31. Alotto P, Guarnieri M, Moro F, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 29, 325 (2014)