Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.32, No.6, 1119-1128, June, 2015
Optimization of hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solution using acid-modified granular activated carbon as adsorbent through response surface methodology
E-mail:
Response surface methodology (RSM) was applied to evaluate the effect of the main operational variables, including initial pH, initial chromium ion concentration, bulk density of GAC and time on the removal of hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) from contaminated groundwater by permeable reactive barriers (PRB) with acid-modified granular activated carbon (GAC) as an adsorbent material. The removal rates of Cr(VI) under different values of these parameters were investigated and results indicated high adsorption capacity at low pH and low initial metal ion concentration of Cr(VI), but the bulk density of GAC slightly influenced the process efficiency. According to the ANOVA (analysis of variance) results, the model presents high R2 values of 94.35% for Cr(VI) removal efficiency, which indicates that the accuracy of the polynomial models was good. Also, quadratic regression models with estimated coefficients were developed to describe the pollutant removals.
Keywords:Permeable Reactive Barriers;Polluted Groundwater;Hexavalent Chromium;Granular Activated Carbon;Response Surface Methodology
- Weng CH, Lin YT, Lin TY, Kao CM, J. Hazard. Mater., 149(2), 292 (2007)
- Rojas G, Silva J, Flores JA, Rodriguez A, Ly M, Maldonado H, Sep. Purif. Technol., 44(1), 31 (2005)
- Alloway BJ, 2nd Ed. London, Blackie Academic and Professional, 368 (1995). (1995)
- Kowalski Z, J. Hazard. Mater., 37, 137 (1994)
- Singh IB, Singh DR, Environ. Technol., 23, 85 (2002)
- Golonka MC, Polyhedron, 15, 3667 (1995)
- Acar FN, Malkoc E, Bioresour. Technol., 94(1), 13 (2004)
- Babel S, Kurniawan TA, Chemosphere, 54, 951 (2004)
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Design Guidance for Application of Permeable Barriers to Remediate Dissolved Chlorinated Solvents. Washington, DC., U.S. Department of the Army, CEMP DG 1110-345-117 (1997).
- Attia AA, Khedr SA, Elkholy SA, Brazilian J. Chem. Eng., 27, 183 (2010)
- Chatterjee S, Lee DS, Lee MW, Woo SH, Bioresour. Technol., 100(17), 3862 (2009)
- Thirunavukkarasu E, Palanivelu K, Indian J. Biotechnol., 6, 359 (2007)
- Yigitoglu M, Arslan M, Polym. Bull., 55(4), 259 (2005)
- Liu SX, Chen X, Chen XY, Liu ZF, Wang HL, J. Hazard. Mater., 141(1), 315 (2007)
- Park SJ, Jang YS, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 249(2), 458 (2002)
- Babel S, Kurniawan TA, Chemosphere, 54, 951 (2004)
- Park G, Lee JK, Ryu SK, Carbon Sci., 3, 219 (2002)
- Selvi K, Pattabhi S, Kadirvelu K, Bioresour. Technol., 80(1), 87 (2001)
- Satapathy D, Natarajanb GS, Patil SJ, J. Chinese Chem. Soc., 52, 35 (2005)
- Aleboyeh A, Daneshvar N, Kasiri MB, Chem. Eng. Process., 47(5), 827 (2008)
- Zaroual Z, Chaair H, Essadki AH, El Ass K, Azzi M, Chem. Eng. J., 148(2-3), 488 (2009)
- Zodi S, Potier O, Lapicque F, Leclerc JP, Desalination, 261(1-2), 186 (2010)
- Arora M, Snape I, Stevens G, Cold Regions Sci. Technol., 66, 12 (2011)
- Wu FC, Tseng RL, Juang RS, Sep. Purif. Technol., 47(1-2), 10 (2005)
- Hu Z, Srinivasan MP, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 27, 11 (1999)
- Hameed BH, Tan IAW, Ahmad AL, J. Hazard. Mater., 164(2-3), 1316 (2009)
- Moghaddam SS, Moghaddam MRA, Arami M, J. Hazard. Mater., 175(1-3), 651 (2010)
- Nordin MY, Venkatesh VC, Sharif S, Elting S, Abdullah A, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 145, 46 (2004)
- Khataee AR, Zarei M, Moradkhannejhad L, Desalination, 258(1-3), 112 (2010)
- Han RP, Wang YF, Yu WH, Zou WH, Shi H, Liu HM, J. Hazard. Mater., 141(3), 713 (2007)
- Hamadi NK, Chen XD, Farid MM, Lu MGQ, Chem. Eng. J., 84(2), 95 (2001)
- Valdes H, Sanchez-Polo M, Rivera-Utrilla J, Zaror CA, Langmuir, 18(6), 2111 (2002)
- Park SJ, Park BJ, Ryu SK, Carbon, 37, 1223 (1999)