International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol.39, No.34, 19846-19850, 2014
Comments on "Computational analysis of geometrical factors affecting experimental data extracted from hydrogen permeation tests: I -Consequences of trapping" [Int J Hydrogen Energy 36 (2011) 12644-12652] and " ... II - Consequences of trapping and an oxide layer" [Int J Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012) 13574-13582], "Corrigenda ... " to both [Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014) 2430], and on " ... III - Comparison with experimental results from the literature" [Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014) 1145-1155] with "Generalized model of desorption kinetics: Characterization of hydrogen trapping in a homogeneous membrane" [Int J Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014) 8374-8384] Discussion
Considering the quoted hydrogen permeation analyses that take into account the species trapping in the course of diffusion, these comments call into question the congruity between performed computations and the model of hydrogen diffusion and trapping in metals used there as the theoretical basement. Presented reasoning brings doubts that the equation of diffusion and trapping implemented in referred calculations matches with the adopted theoretical framework. Adduced derivations evidence their disagreement. In consequence, addressed numerical simulations and recommendations deduced therefrom deserve reconsideration Copyright (C) 2014, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.