화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Materials Research, Vol.23, No.1, 24-30, January, 2013
탄화온도 및 재담금 처리에 따른 중공형 탄소다공체의 기공구조 및 특성
Pore Structure and Characteristics of Hollow Spherical Carbon Foam According to Carbonization Temperature and Re-immersion Treatment
E-mail:
Today, the modification of carbon foam for high performance remains a major issue in the environment and energy industries. One promising way to solve this problem is the optimization of the pore structure for desired properties as well as for efficient performance. In this study, using a sol-gel process followed by carbonization in an inert atmosphere, hollow spherical carbon foam was prepared using resorcinol and formaldehyde precursors catalyzed by 4-aminobenzoic acid; the effect of carbonization temperature and re-immersion treatment on the pore structure and characteristics of the hollow spherical carbon foam was investigated. As the carbonization temperature increased, the porosity and average pore diameter were found to decrease but the compression strength and electrical conductivity dramatically increased in the temperature range of this study (700 oC to 850 oC). The significant differences of X-ray diffraction patterns obtained from the carbon foams carbonized under different temperatures implied that the degree of crystallinity greatly affects the characteristics of the carbon form. Also, the number of re-impregnations of carbon form in the resorcinol-formaldehyde resin was varied from 1 to 10 times, followed by re-carbonization at 800 oC for 2 hours under argon gas flow. As the number of re-immersion treatments increased, the porosity decreased while the compression strength improved by about four times when re-impregnation was repeated 10 times. These results imply the possibility of customizing the characteristics of carbon foam by controlling the carbonization and re-immersion conditions.
  1. Gallego NC, Klett JW, Carbon, 41, 1461 (2003)
  2. Kim J, Cunningham N, J. Power Sources, 195(8), 2291 (2010)
  3. Ji CW, Yi EJ, Kim YD, Rhyim Y, J. Kor. Powd. Metal. Inst., 18(2), 141 (2011)
  4. Rhyim YM, Ji CW, Yi EJ, Heo JH and Kim YD, in Proceedings of MetFoam2011 (Busan, Korea, September 2011) p.129. (2011)
  5. Rhyim YM, Heo JH, Lee CW and Yi EJ, Korean Patent 10-1183029 (2012)
  6. Ford W, US patent 3121050 (1964). (1964)
  7. Chen C, Kennel EB, Stiller AH, Stansberry PG, Zondlo JW, Carbon, 44, 1535 (2006)
  8. Googin J, Napier J and Scrivner M, US Patent 3345440. (1967)
  9. Min ZH, Cao M, Zhang S, Wang XD, Wang YG, New Carbon Materials, 22(1), 75 (2007)
  10. Wang YG, Min ZH, Cao M, Xu DP, New Carbon Materials, 24(4), 321 (2009)
  11. Lei S, Guo Q, Shi J, Liu L, Carbon, 48, 2644 (2010)
  12. Bruneton E, Tallaron C, Gras-Naulin N, Cosculluela A, Carbon, 40, 1919 (2002)
  13. Rhyim YM, Lee CW, Yi EJ, Choi SY, Kim YD, in Proceedings of ISNNM 2012 (Istanbul, Turkey, August 2012) p.92. (2012)
  14. Zhang L, Ma J, Carbon, 47, 1451 (2009)
  15. Rattanaweeranon S, Limsuwan P, Thongpool V, Piriyawong V, Asanithi P, Procedia Engineering, 32, 1100 (2012)
  16. Fang Z, Li C, Sun J, Zhang H, Zhang J, Carbon, 45, 2873 (2007)
  17. Najeh I, Mansour NB, Mbarki M, Houas A, Ph.Nogier J, El Mir L, Solid State Sci., 11, 1747 (2009)