화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.20, No.5, 2801-2805, September, 2014
Application of O3 and O3/H2O2 as post-treatment processes for color removal in swine wastewater from a membrane filtration system
E-mail:
This study was aimed to evaluate the use of ozone (O3) alone and peroxone (a combination of ozone and hydrogen peroxide; O3/H2O2) as post-treatment processes for color removal in swine wastewater from a membrane filtration system. Results showed that the application of ozone-alone process or the peroxone process could reduce both capital and operating costs compared to reverse osmosis (RO) treatment. Of the two oxidation processes, the ozone-alone process was the most effective for treating nanofiltration (NF)-filtered wastewater, while the peroxone process was the most effective for treating ultrafiltration (UF)-filtered wastewater.
  1. Lee BH, Song WC, Manna B, Yang HJ, Kim JH, Kim YS, 2007 International Forum on Strategic Technology, IFOST, p. 120. (2007)
  2. Tran HT, Kim DH, Jia YH, Oh SJ, Ahn DH, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 13(6), 985 (2007)
  3. Osada T, Haga K, Harada Y, Water Res., 25, 1377 (1991)
  4. Kim JH, Chen M, Kishida N, Sudo R, Water Res., 38, 3340 (2004)
  5. Cheng J, Liu B, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 127, 705 (2001)
  6. Deng LW, Zheng P, Chen Z, Mahmood Q, Bioresour. Technol., 99(8), 3136 (2008)
  7. Mook WT, Aroua MKT, Chakrabarti MH, Noor IM, Irfan MF, Low CTJ, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 19(1), 1 (2013)
  8. Vandevivere PC, Bianchi R, Verstraete W, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 72(4), 289 (1998)
  9. Jonsson AS, Jonsson C, Teppler M, Tomani P, Wannstrom S, Desalination, 105, 263 (1996)
  10. Ciardelli G, Corsi L, Marcucci M, Resour. Conserv. Recy., 31, 189 (2000)
  11. Wu J, Eiteman MA, Law SE, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 124, 272 (1998)
  12. Green SA, Blough NV, Limnol. Oceanogr., 39(8), 1903 (1994)
  13. Guo WD, Huang JP, Hong HS, Xu J, Deng X, Huanjing Kexue/Environ. Sci., 31(6), 1419 (2010)
  14. Yoon Y, Ok YS, Kim DY, Kim JG, Water Sci. Technol., 49(5-6), 405 (2004)
  15. Staehelin J, Hoigne J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 1206 (1985)
  16. Preethi V, Kalyani KSP, Iyappan K, Srinivasakannan C, Balasubramaniam N, Vedaraman N, J. Hazard. Mater., 166(1), 150 (2009)
  17. Sarasa J, Roche MP, Ormad MP, Gimeno E, Puig A, Ovelleiro JL, Water Res., 32, 2721 (1998)
  18. Hong SW, Choi YS, Kwon G, Park KY, Water Sci. Technol., 52, 107 (2005)
  19. Glaze WH, Kang JW, Chapin DH, Ozone: Sci. Eng., 9, 335 (1987)
  20. Amiri AS, Bolton JR, Cater SR, Water Res., 31, 787 (1997)
  21. An YJ, Carraway ER, Water Res., 36, 309 (2002)
  22. Gulyas H, von Bismarck R, Hemmerling L, Water Sci. Technol., 32, 127 (1995)
  23. Wujun X, Guochen Z, Mingxia Z, Jian C, Kaijun W, Prog. Chem., 22, 1002 (2010)
  24. Jung YJ, Kim WG, Yoon Y, Hwang TM, Kang JW, Ozone: Sci. Eng., 34(3), 156 (2012)
  25. Vogelpohl A, Kim SM, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 10(1), 33 (2004)
  26. Shin CH, Bae JS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 18(2), 775 (2012)
  27. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation (APHA/AWWA/WEF), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington DC, USA, 21st ed. (2005)
  28. Staehelin J, Hoigne J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 16, 676 (1982)
  29. von Sonntag C, Water Sci. Technol., 58, 1015 (2008)
  30. Glaze WH, Kang JW, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 1573 (1989)
  31. Sevimli MF, Sarikaya HZ, M.S. Yazgan, Ozone: Sci. Eng., 25, 137 (2003)