화학공학소재연구정보센터
Clean Technology, Vol.7, No.2, 99-107, June, 2001
Practical Optimization Methods for Finding Best Recycling Pathways of Plastic Materials
Optimization methodologies have been proposed of find the best environment-friendly recycling pathways of plastic materials based on lifed-cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The main difficulty in conducting this optimization study is that multiple environmental burdens have to be considered simultaneously as the cost functions. Instead of generating conservative Pareto or noninferior solutions following multi-objective optimization approaches, we have proposed some practical criteria on how to combine the different environmental burdens into a single measure. The obtained single objective optimization problem can then be solved by conventional nonlinear programming techniques or, more effectively, by a tree search method based on decision flows. The latter method reduces multi-dimensional optimization problems to a set of one-dimensional problems in series. It is expected the suggested tree search approach can be applied to many LCA studies as a new promising optimization tool.
  1. Mustafa N, Plastics Waste Management: Disposal, Recycling and Reuse, Marcel Dekker, New York (1993)
  2. Scheirs J, Polymer Recycling: Science, Technology and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1998)
  3. Curran MA, LCA Methodology, Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment, McGraw-Hill, New York (1996)
  4. Song HS, Hyun JC, Conserv. Recycling, 27(3), 267 (1999) 
  5. Boustead I, "Theory and Definitions in Ecobalances," REcycling and Recovery of Plastics, Brandrup, J., Bittner, M., Michaeli, W. and Menges, G., Eds., Hanser Publishers, New York (1995)
  6. Azapagic A, Clift R, Comput. Chem. Eng., 19(S), 229 (1995) 
  7. Molgaard C, Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 15(1), 51 (1995) 
  8. Song HS, Optimal Strategies for Plastics Manufacturing and Recycling, Ph.D. Thesis, Korea University, Seoul, Korea (1999)
  9. Song HS, Moon KS, Hyun JC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 16(2), 202 (1999)
  10. Edgar TF, Himmelblau DM, Optimization of Chemical Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York (1988)
  11. Reklaitis GV, Ravindran A, Ragsdell KM, Engineering Optimization: Methods and Applications, Wiley-Interscience, New York (1983)
  12. Biegler LT, Grossmann IE, Westerberg AW, Systematic Methods of Chemical Process Design, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1997)
  13. Craighill AL, Powell JC, Resour. Conserv. Recycling, 17, 75 (1996) 
  14. Commission for the European Communities, Assessment of the External Costs of the Coal Fuel Cycle (1994)
  15. Korea Petroleum Association (KPA), Oil Statistics, December (1998)
  16. Korea Resources Recovery and Reutilization Corporation (KORECO), Evaluation of Technical and Economic Feasibility of Recycling, Report of KORECO, March (1997)
  17. Goedkroop M, "Beyond Distance to Target," Christiansen, K., Heijungs, R., Rydberg, T., Ryding, S.O., Sund., L., Wijnen, H., Vold., M., and Hanssen, O.J., Eds., Application of Life CycleAssessments (LCA), Report from Expert Workshop at Hanko, Norway (1995)
  18. Corten FGP, Haspel P, Kreuzberg GJ, Sas HJW, Wit G, Weighting Environmental Problems for Product Policy, Phase 1, Delft, The Netherlands (1994)
  19. Rao SS, Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1996)