Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol.389, 47-54, 2014
Effect of solidification parameters on the microstructures of superalloy CMSX-6 formed during the downward directional solidification process
The single crystal Ni-base superalloy CMSX-6 was cast by using the downward directional solidification process (DWDS) using withdrawal rates of between 0.0013 and 0.0217 cm/s. The evolutions of as-cast microstructures were characterized as functions of the withdrawal rate. The primary and secondary dendrite arm spacings, lambda(1) and lambda(2), decreased with increasing withdrawal rate, which is similar to the experimental results obtained in the conventional Bridgman process. However, the value of lambda(1) and lambda(2) measured in the present work is much smaller than that in the Bridgman process. In addition to this, the value of 21 cannot be reasonably described by the theoretical models for the primary dendrite arm spacing in which the convection effect was not taken into account. In comparison, the theoretical model of Bouchard and Kirkaldy which considers the convection factor can predict the lambda(1) value well in the present work if the dendrite-calibrating factor (a(1)) is assumed to be 13.5. The sizes of the gamma' phase in the dendrite and interdendritic regions were also reduced with an increased withdrawal rate. The shape of the gamma' phase was cuboidal in the dendritic regions at all experimental withdrawal rates. This contrasts with the gamma' phase in the dendrite cores which became more rounded at the highest withdrawal rates employed in the present work, due to the low supersaturation and insufficient growth time With an increased withdrawal rate, significant reduction in the size of the gamma/gamma' eutectic island was observed in the samples. Meanwhile, the microsegregation of the alloying elements was reduced and the volume fraction of the gamma/gamma' eutectic initially decreased and then increased. The difference in the shape of the gamma/gamma' eutectic was also found in those samples processed at low withdrawal rates as well as at high withdrawal rates. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.