화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.30, No.1, 45-49, January, 2013
The effects of viscosity, surface tension, and flow rate on gasoil-water flow pattern in microchannels
E-mail:
A microchannel was fabricated with glass tubes to investigate the effect of viscosity, surface tension, and flow rate on the liquid-liquid two-phase flow regime. Water and gasoil were selected as aqueous and organic working fluids, respectively. The two fluids were injected into the microchannel and created either slug or parallel profile depending on the applied conditions. The range of Reynolds and capillary numbers was chosen in such a way that neither inertia nor interfacial tension forces were negligible. Xanthan gum was used to increase viscosity and Triton X-100 (TX-100) and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate (SDS) were used to reduce the interfacial tension. The results demonstrated that higher value of viscosity and flow rate increased interfacial area, but slug flow regime remained unchanged. The two surfactants showed different effects on the flow regime and interfacial area. Addition of TX-100 did not change the slug flow but decreased the interfacial area. In contrast, addition of SDS increased interfacial area by decreasing the slug’s length in the low concentrations and by switching from slug to parallel regime at high concentrations.
  1. Cao EH, Motherwell WB, Gavriilidis A, Chem. Eng. Technol., 29(11), 1372 (2006)
  2. Wang K, Lu YC, Xu JH, Gong XC, Luo GS, AIChE J., 52(12), 4207 (2006)
  3. Huang D, Lu YC, Wang YJ, Yang L, Luo GS, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(11), 3870 (2008)
  4. Plazl PZ, Plazl I, Process Biochem., 44, 1115 (2009)
  5. Mills PL, Quiram DJ, Ryley JF, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(24), 6992 (2007)
  6. Zaloha P, Kristal J, Jiricny V, Volkel N, Xuereb C, Aubin J, Chem. Eng. Sci., 68(1), 640 (2012)
  7. Zhang T, Cao B, Fan YL, Gonthier Y, Luo LG, Wang SD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66(23), 5791 (2011)
  8. Aoki N, Tanigawa S, Mae K, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66, 6536 (2011)
  9. Choi C, Yu DI, Kim M, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science., 35, 1086 (2011)
  10. Sobieszuk P, Pohorecki R, Cyganski P, Grzelka J, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66(23), 6048 (2011)
  11. YuMei Y, Chao Y, Yi J, Ameya J, YouChun S, XiaoLong Y, Sci. China Chem., 54, 244 (2011)
  12. Dessimoz AL, Cavin L, Renken A, Kiwi-Minsker L, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63(16), 4035 (2008)
  13. Kashid MN, Gerlach I, Goetz S, Franzke J, Acker JF, Platte F, Agar DW, Turek S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(14), 5003 (2005)
  14. Dummann G, Quittmann U, Groschel L, Agar DW, Worz O, Morgenschweis K, Catal. Today, 79(1-4), 433 (2003)
  15. Zhao YC, Su YH, Chen GW, Yuan Q, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(5), 1563 (2010)
  16. Harries N, Burns JR, Barrow DA, Ramshaw C, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 46(17), 3313 (2003)
  17. Tan J, Xu JH, Li SW, Luo GS, Chem. Eng. J., 136(2-3), 306 (2008)
  18. Burns JR, Ramshaw C, Lab on a Chip., 1, 10 (2001)
  19. Kashid MN, Agar DW, Chem. Eng. J., 131(1-3), 1 (2007)
  20. Kashid M, Kiwi-Minsker L, Chem. Eng. Process., DOI:10.1016/j.cep.2011.07.003.
  21. Foroughi H, Kawaji M, International Journal of Multiphase Flow., 37, 1147 (2011)
  22. Guillot P, Colin A, Physical Review., 72, 066301 (2005)
  23. Cubaud T, Mason TG, Phys. Fluids., 20, 053302 (2008)
  24. Su YH, Zhao YC, Chen GW, Yuan QA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(13), 3947 (2010)
  25. Zhang XW, Liu X, Gu DX, Zhou W, Xie T, Mo YH, J. Food Eng., 27(2), 203 (1996)
  26. Joseph DD, J. Fluid Mech., 141, 309 (1984)
  27. Soboleva OA, Badun GA, Summ BD, VestnikMoskovskogoUniversiteta, Khimiya, 1, 17 (2007)
  28. Erdogan D, Izmir University of technology, Master of Science Thesis (2005)