3 - 11 |
Detailed characterisation of fouling deposition and removal on a hollow fibre membrane by direct observation technique Marselina Y, Le-Clech P, Stuetz R, Chen V |
12 - 19 |
Start-up of a membrane bioreactor bioaugmented with genetically engineered microorganism for enhanced treatment of atrazine containing wastewater Liu C, Huang X, Wang H |
20 - 26 |
Upgrading and retrofitting of municipal wastewater treatment plants by means of membrane bioreactor (NMR) technology Brepols C, Dorgeloh E, Frechen FB, Fuchs W, Haider S, Joss A, de Korte K, Ruiken C, Schier W, van der Roest H, Wett M, Wozniak T |
27 - 34 |
Toward a better identification of foulant species in MBR processes Teychene B, Guigui C, Cabassud C, Amy G |
35 - 43 |
Membrane fouling control through the change of the depth of a membrane module in a submerged membrane bioreactor for advanced wastewater treatment Kim JY, Chang IS, Shin DH, Park HH |
44 - 51 |
Fundamental understanding of organic matter fouling of membranes Amy G |
52 - 60 |
Immersed membrane bioreactors for nitrate removal from drinking water: Cost and feasibility McAdam EJ, Judd SJ |
61 - 70 |
Comparison of membrane bioreactor systems in wastewater treatment Guo WS, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH, Xing W |
71 - 81 |
Survey of the European MBR market: trends and perspectives Lesjean B, Huisjes EH |
82 - 90 |
Modelling an aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor with ASM models on a large range of sludge retention time Sperandio M, Espinosa MC |
91 - 98 |
An anaerobic baffled reactor/membrane bioreactor (ABR/MBR) for on-site sanitation in low income areas Pillay S, Foxon KM, Buckley CA |
99 - 107 |
Monitoring of SUR to control and enhance the performance of dead-end ultrafiltration installations treating wwtp effluent Janssen AN, van Agtmaal J, van den Broek WBP, de Koning J, Menkveld HWH, Schrotter JC, Teeuw H, van der Graaf JHJM |
108 - 114 |
Pre-treatment of municipal MBR applications Frechen FB, Schier W, Linden C |
115 - 123 |
Correlation of biofouling with the bio-cake architecture in an MBR Lee CH, Park PK, Lee WN, Hwang BK, Hong SH, Yeon KM, Oh HS, Chang IS |
124 - 132 |
Membrane fouling in a pilot-scale submerged membrane bioreactor operated under various conditions Yigit NO, Harman I, Civelekoglu G, Koseoglu H, Cicek N, Kitis M |
133 - 140 |
Characterization and performance of different types of hollow fibre membranes in a laboratory-scale MBR for the treatment of industrial wastewater Bienati B, Bottino A, Capannelli G, Comite A |
141 - 149 |
Does fouling in MBRs depend on SMP? Drews A, Vocks M, Bracklow U, Iversen V, Kraume M |
150 - 155 |
Decomposition of EPS on the membrane surface and its influence on the fouling mechanism in MBRs Nagaoka H, Akoh H |
156 - 165 |
Towards standardisation of the NMR technology? De Wilde W, Richard A, Lesjean B, Tazi-Pain A |
166 - 174 |
Pre-ozonation for dead-end microfiltration of the secondary effluent: suspended particles and membrane fouling Zhu HT, Wen XH, Huang X |
175 - 181 |
Subcritical fouling behaviour modelling of membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment: The prediction of the time to reach critical operating condition Saroj DP, Guglielmi G, Chiarani D, Andreottola G |
182 - 190 |
Impact of aeration rates on particle colloidal fraction in the biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR) Ivanovic I, Leiknes T |
191 - 199 |
Investigating the impact of production conditions on membrane properties for MBR applications Buetehorn S, Koh CN, Wintgens T, Volmering D, Vossenkaul K, Melin T |
200 - 208 |
Treatment of swine wastewater by submerged membrane bioreactors with consideration of estrogenic activity removal Yang W, Cicek N |
209 - 218 |
MBR functioning under steady and unsteady state conditions. Impact on performances and membrane fouling dynamics Lebegue J, Heran M, Grasmick A |
219 - 226 |
Prediction of the circulation velocity in a membrane bioreactor Prieske H, Drews A, Kraume M |
227 - 235 |
Feasibility of thermophilic anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) for wastewater treatment Jeison D, van Lier JB |
236 - 242 |
Alternative MBR configurations: using membranes for gas transfer Semmens MJ |
245 - 252 |
Membrane bioreactor: Distribution of critical flux throughout an immersed HF bundle Lebegue J, Heran M, Grasmick A |
253 - 267 |
Influence of mechanical mixing intensity on a biofilm structure and permeability in a membrane bioreactor Khan SJ, Visvanathan C |
268 - 275 |
The difference in characteristics of foulants in submerged MBRs caused by the difference in the membrane flux Kimura K, Miyoshi T, Naruse T, Yamato N, Ogyu R, Watanabe Y |
276 - 282 |
A novel nanofiltration hybrid system to control organic micro-pollutants: application of dual functional adsorbent/catalyst Kim JH, Kim S, Lee CH, Kwon HH, Lee S |
283 - 289 |
Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis in winemaking Massot A, Mietton-Peuchot M, Peuchot C, Milisic V |
290 - 296 |
Case studies on rapid coagulation processes to cope with total emission controls Yoon TI, Kim CG |
297 - 304 |
Pig manure treatment by organic bed biofiltration Buelna G, Dube R, Turgeon N |
305 - 313 |
The role of a membrane performance enhancer in a membrane bioreactor: a comparison with other submerged membrane hybrid systems Guo WS, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH, Kandasamy J, Yoon S |
314 - 322 |
Morphological characteristics and fractal approach of the flocs obtained from the natural organic matter extracts of water of the Keddara dam (Algeria) Aouabed A, Boussaad DEH, Ben Aim R |
323 - 331 |
Fiber filter as an alternative to the process of flocculation-sedimentation for water treatment Lee JJ, Cha JH, Ben Aim R, Han KB, Kim CW |
332 - 339 |
Ultraflitration of wastewater with pretreatment: evaluation of flux decline models Shon HK, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Shim WG |