1 - 4 |
The state-of-the-art of filtration in recovery processes for biopharmaceutical production Christy C, Vermant S |
5 - 10 |
Design and construction of a modular pilot plant for the treatment of oil-containing wastewaters Benito JM, Rios G, Ortea E, Fernandez E, Cambiella A, Pazos C, Coca J |
11 - 17 |
Transport of perchlorate (ClO4-) through NF and UF membranes Yoon Y, Amy G, Cho JW, Her N, Pellegrino J |
19 - 23 |
Filtration of yeast suspensions: experimental observations and modelling of dead-end filtration with a compressible cake Meireles M, Clifton M, Aimar P |
25 - 30 |
Enhanced microfiltration of yeast by flocculation Wickramasinghe SR, Wu YL, Han BB |
31 - 36 |
Comparison of three different systems used for flux enhancement: application to crossflow filtration of yeast suspensions Al-akoum O, Mercier-Bonin M, Ding LH, Fonade C, Aptel P, Jaffrin M |
37 - 42 |
Investigation on the effect of flocculants on the filtration behavior in microfiltration of fine particles Nguyen MT, Ripperger S |
43 - 48 |
Effect of ozonation for reducing membrane-fouling in the UF membrane Park YG |
49 - 54 |
Microfiltration of kraft black liquors for the removal of colloidal suspended matter (pitch) Cortinas S, Luque S, Alvarez JR, Canaval J, Romero J |
55 - 62 |
Field evaluation of capillary UF technology as a pretreatment for large seawater RO systems Glueckstern P, Priel M, Wilf M |
63 - 68 |
Application of out-in MF/UF-systems for drinking water treatment with air supported backwash - three case studies Lipp P, Baldauf G |
69 - 75 |
Two years of nanofiltration at the Mery-sur-Oise plant, France Cyna B, Chagneau G, Bablon G, Tanghe N |
77 - 81 |
Integrated membrane operations for seawater desalination Drioli E, Criscuoli A, Curcio E |
83 - 88 |
Flocculation-cross-flow microfiltration hybrid system for natural organic matter (NOM) removal using hematite as a flocculent Thiruvenkatachari R, Ngo HH, Hagare P, Vigneswaran S, Ben Aim R |
89 - 94 |
Treatment of dairy process waters by membrane operations for water reuse and milk constituents concentration Balannec B, Gesan-Guiziou G, Chaufer B, Rabiller-Baudry M, Daufin G |
95 - 100 |
Impact of coagulation conditions on the in-line coagulation/UF process for drinking water production Guigui C, Rouch JC, Durand-Bourlier L, Bonnelye V, Aptel P |
101 - 107 |
Pressure driven membrane techniques in the treatment of water containing THMs Bodzek M, Waniek A, Konieczny K |
109 - 116 |
Using activated carbon to improve natural water treatment by porous membranes Konieczny K, Klomfas G |
117 - 122 |
The influence of organic carbon concentration on atrazine removal by UF membranes Majewska-Nowak K, Kabsch-Korbutowicz M, Dodz M, Winnicki T |
123 - 126 |
Novel applications of membrane processes in soil cleanup operations Volchek K, Velicogna D, Obenauf A, Somers A, Wong B, Tremblay AY |
127 - 132 |
Method for experimental determination of the gas transport properties of highly porous fibre membranes: a first step before predictive modelling of a membrane distillation Guijt CM, Meindersma GW, Reith T, de Haan AB |
133 - 138 |
The heat and mass transfer phenomena in osmotic membrane distillation Celere M, Gostoli C |
139 - 145 |
Water desalination using membrane distillation: comparison between inside/out and outside/in permeation Wirth D, Cabassud C |
147 - 148 |
Human plasma ultrafiltrate purification by membrane distillation: process optimisation and evaluation of its possible application on-line Criscuoli A, Drioli E, Capuano A, Memoli B, Andreucci VE |
149 - 156 |
Acoustic field-assisted osmotic membrane distillation Narayan AV, Nagaraj N, Hebbar HU, Chakkaravarthi A, Raghavarao KSMS, Nene S |
157 - 160 |
Membrane distillation for the concentration of raw cane-sugar syrup and membrane clarified sugarcane juice Nene S, Kaur S, Sumod K, Joshi B, Raghavarao KSMS |
161 - 166 |
Economic analysis of ethanol and fructose production by selective fermentation coupled to pervaporation: effect of membrane costs on process economics Di Luccio M, Borges CP, Alves TLM |
167 - 171 |
Mathematical modeling of influence of porous structure a membrane on its vapour-conductivity in the process of membrane distillation Ugrozov VV, Elkina IB |
173 - 178 |
Synthesis and characterization of polyaryl blend membranes having different composition, different covalent and/or ionical cross-linking density, and their application to DMFC Kerres J, Zhang W, Ullrich A, Tang CM, Hein M, Gogel V, Frey T, Jorissen L |
179 - 182 |
New polymeric electrolyte membranes based on proton donor-proton acceptor properties for direct methanol fuel cells Manea C, Mulder M |
183 - 189 |
Role of post-sulfonation thermal treatment in conducting and thermal properties of sulfuric acid sulfonated poly(benzimidazole) membranes Ariza MJ, Jones DJ, Roziere J |
191 - 196 |
Comparison of different cells for resistance determination of freely standing polymer membranes developed for direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) applications Mohr R, Kudela V, Schauer J, Richau K |
197 - 203 |
Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimisation Bowen WR, Welfoot JS |
205 - 212 |
Understanding the steric and charge contributions in NF membranes using increasing MWCO polyamide membranes Mohammad AW, Ali N |
213 - 216 |
Effect of divalent cations on permeate volume flux through porous titania membranes Tsuru T, Hironaka D, Yoshioka T, Asaeda M |
217 - 221 |
Nanofiltration of solutions containing surfactants - prediction of flux decline and modelling of mass transfer Wendler B, Goers B, Wozny G |
223 - 229 |
A comparison of membrane charge of a low nanofiltration ceramic membrane determined from ionic retention and tangential streaming potential measurements Labbez C, Fievet R, Szymczyk A, Thomas F, Simon C, Vidonne A, Pagetti J, Foissy A |
231 - 236 |
Modeling of multi-electrolyte transport in charged ceramic and organic nanofilters using the computer simulation program NanoFlux Palmeri J, Sandeaux J, Sandeaux R, Lefebvre X, David P, Guizard C, Amblard P, Diaz JF, Lamaze B |
237 - 241 |
The relationship between flux decline of NF membranes with NOM transport characteristics: convection vs. diffusion Lee S, Moon J, Yim SK, Moon SH, Cho J |
243 - 250 |
Particle interactions and removal of trace contaminants from water and wastewaters Schafer AI, Mastrup M, Jensen RL |
251 - 255 |
Use of ATR/FTIR spectrometry to study fouling of microfiltration membranes by natural waters Howe KJ, Ishida KP, Clark MM |
257 - 262 |
Study of the CaSO4 deposits in the presence of scale inhibitors Atamanenko I, Kryvoruchko A, Yurlova L, Tsapiuk E |
263 - 268 |
Performance of flexible membrane using kaolin dynamic membrane in treating domestic wastewater Noor MJMM, Ahmadun FR, Mohamed TA, Muyibi SA, Pescod MB |
269 - 274 |
Adsorptive interactions between membranes and trace contaminants Nghiem LD, Schafer AI, Waite TD |
275 - 280 |
Potentiality of organic solvents filtration with ceramic membranes. A comparison with polymer membranes Guizard C, Ayral A, Julbe A |
281 - 288 |
Evaluation of parameters describing flux decline in nanofiltration of aqueous solutions containing organic compounds Van der Bruggen B, Braeken L, Vandecasteele C |
289 - 294 |
Effect of precipitation and complexation on nanofiltration of strontium-containing nuclear wastewater Hwang ED, Lee KW, Choo KH, Choi SJ, Kim SH, Yoon CH, Lee CH |
295 - 299 |
Separation of ions in acidic conditions using NF Tanninen J, Nystrom M |
301 - 306 |
Homogeneous catalyst separation and re-use through nanofiltration of organic solvents Nair D, Luthra SS, Scarpello JT, White LS, dos Santos LMF, Livingston AG |
307 - 313 |
Observations on solvent flux and solute rejection across solvent resistant nanofiltration membranes Gibbins E, D'Antonio M, Nair D, White LS, dos Santos LMF, Vankelecom IFJ, Livingston AG |
315 - 320 |
Purification of phosphoric acid solutions by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration Gonzalez MP, Navarro R, Saucedo I, Avila M, Revilla J, Bouchard C |
321 - 326 |
Preparation and properties of ZSM-5 zeolite membrane obtained by low-temperature chemical vapor deposition Li J, Nguyen QT, Zhou LZ, Wang T, Long YC, Ping ZH |
327 - 329 |
Pervaporation of aqueous organic mixtures through Ge-ZSM-5 zeolite membranes Bowen TC, Li SG, Tuan VA, Falconer JL, Noble RD |
331 - 332 |
Separation of C-4 and C-6 isomer mixtures and alcohol-water solutions by monolith supported B-ZSM-5 membranes Bowen TC, Kalipcilar H, Falconer JL, Noble RD |
333 - 338 |
VS-1 composite membrane: preparation and characterization Tavolaro A |
339 - 344 |
Computational chemical study on separation of benzene and cyclohexane by a NaY zeolite membrane Kobayashi Y, Takami S, Kubo M, Miyamoto A |
345 - 350 |
Electrotransport of weak-acid anions through anion-exchange membranes Pismenskaya N, Nikonenko V, Volodina E, Pourcelly G |
351 - 357 |
Sorption and diffusion behaviors of water in Nafion 117 membranes with different counter ions Legras M, Hirata Y, Nguyen QT, Langevin D, Metayer M |
359 - 361 |
Conductivity and selectivity of ion exchange membranes: structure-correlations Pourcelly G |
363 - 368 |
Correlation between ion-exchange membranes characteristics for evaluation of the permselectivity and the diffusion coefficients Nouri S, Dammak L, Larchet C, Auclair B |
369 - 374 |
Mathematical description of ion transport in membrane systems Nikonenko V, Zabolotsky V, Larchet C, Auclair B, Pourcelly G |
375 - 380 |
Facilitated transport of alpha-alanine and phenylalanine through sulfonic cation-exchange membranes Metayer M, Legras M, Grigorchouk O, Nikonenko V, Langevin D, Labbe M, Lebrun L, Shaposhnik V |
381 - 385 |
Influence of the solid nature in the efficiency of an electrokinetic process Akretche DE |
387 - 392 |
Space charge effect on competitive ion transport through ion-exchange membranes Zabolotsky VI, Manzanares JA, Nikonenko VV, Lebedev KA, Lovtsov EG |
393 - 398 |
Mathematical simulation of a stationary electrodiffusion kinetics in multilayer ion-exchange membrane systems with the help of the numerical shooting parallel method continued by parameters Lebedev KA, Lovtsov EG |
399 - 403 |
Combined effect of salt concentration and pressure gradients across charged membranes Benavente J, Jonsson G |
405 - 410 |
Transport modelling of a polyelectrolyte in membrane chromatography under an electric field Park YG, Lim HE |
411 - 416 |
The influence of alloy composition on the H(2)flux of composite Pd-Cu membranes Roa F, Block MJ, Way JD |
417 - 423 |
High-flux palladium-silver alloy membranes fabricated by microsystem technology Gielens FC, Tong HD, van Rijn CJM, Vorstman MAG, Keurentjes JTF |
425 - 431 |
Preparation and characterization of Pd-zeolite composite membranes for hydrogen separation Moron F, Pina MP, Urriolabeitia E, Menendez M, Santamaria J |
433 - 438 |
Ultrapurification of gases in a continuous membrane column cascade Vorotyntsev VM, Drozdov PN |
439 - 444 |
Enhancement of oxygen permeation by La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-delta coating in La0.7Sr0.3Ga0.6Fe0.4O3-delta membrane Lee KS, Lee S, Kim JW, Woo SK |
445 - 448 |
Hydrogen transport in palladium membranes Elkina IB, Meldon JH |
449 - 454 |
Permeation and separation under high temperature and high pressure for ethanol/water vapors through cross-linked quaternized chitosan composite membranes Uragami T, Tanaka Y, Nishida S |