| 1 |
A novel HAZOP approach for literature review on biomass supply chain optimisation model
Lim CH, Lam HL, Ng WPQ
Energy, 146, 13, 2018 |
| 2 |
Comparative risk study of hydrogen and gasoline dispensers for vehicles
Hirayama M, Shinozaki H, Kasai N, Otaki T
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(27), 12584, 2018 |
| 3 |
A HAZOP Gap Query Approach for Hazard Assessment in Multiproduct Facilities
Torres J, Ashley N
Process Safety Progress, 37(2), 161, 2018 |
| 4 |
Benefits of simple consequence modeling for Burner Management Systems
Braedel M
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 49, 125, 2017 |
| 5 |
Results matter: Three case studies comparing and contrasting PFFM and HazOp PHA reviews
MacGregor RJ
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 49, 266, 2017 |
| 6 |
Beyond HAZOP and LOPA: Four different company approaches
Chastain JW, Delanoy P, Devlin C, Mueller T, Study K
Process Safety Progress, 36(1), 38, 2017 |
| 7 |
One company's observations on the implementation of LOPA
Bertelsmann A
Process Safety Progress, 36(3), 284, 2017 |
| 8 |
Design intent for hazard and operability studies
Baybutt P
Process Safety Progress, 35(1), 36, 2016 |
| 9 |
Identify SIF and Specify Necessary SIL, and Other IPLs, as Part of PHA/HAZOP - or - Why It is Not Necessary to "Boldly Go beyond HAZOP and LOPA"
Bridges WG, Dowell AM
Process Safety Progress, 35(4), 349, 2016 |
| 10 |
A critique of the Hazard and Operability (HAZOP) study
Baybutt P
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 33, 52, 2015 |
