1 |
Comparison of calculated mercury emissions from three Alberta power plants over a 33 week period - Influence of geological environment Goodarzi F, Reyes J, Abrahams K Fuel, 87(6), 915, 2008 |
2 |
Column leaching of coal and its combustion residues, Shizuishan, China Wang WF, Qin Y, Song DY, Wang KX International Journal of Coal Geology, 75(2), 81, 2008 |
3 |
Petrography of feed coals in the Soma power plant, Manisa, Turkey Bulut Y, Karayigit AI Energy Sources Part A-recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects, 28(16), 1447, 2006 |
4 |
Assessment of elemental content of milled coal, combustion residues, and stack emitted materials: Possible environmental effects for a Canadian pulverized coal-fired power plant Goodarzi F International Journal of Coal Geology, 65(1-2), 17, 2006 |
5 |
Parameters influencing the variation in mercury emissions from an Alberta power plant burning high inertinite coal over thirty-eight weeks period Goodarzi F, Reyes J, Schulz J, Hollman D, Rose D International Journal of Coal Geology, 65(1-2), 26, 2006 |
6 |
Petrology of subbituminous feed coal as a guide to the capture of mercury by fly ash - influence of depositional environment Goodarzi F International Journal of Coal Geology, 61(1-2), 1, 2005 |
7 |
Mineralogy, elemental composition and modes of occurrence of elements in Canadian feed-coals Goodarzi F Fuel, 81(9), 1199, 2002 |