1 |
Spillover as a cause of bias in baseline evaluation methods for demand response programs Todd A, Cappers P, Spurlock CA, Jin L Applied Energy, 250, 344, 2019 |
2 |
Simple electric utility platform: A hardware/software solution for operating emergent microgrids Manur A, Venkataramanan G, Sehloff D Applied Energy, 210, 748, 2018 |
3 |
Demand response of customers in Kitakyushu smart community project to critical peak pricing of electricity Li YX, Gao WJ, Ruan YJ, Ushifusa Y Energy and Buildings, 168, 251, 2018 |
4 |
Are vulnerable customers any different than their peers when exposed to critical peak pricing: Evidence from the US Cappers P, Spurlock CA, Todd A, Jin L Energy Policy, 123, 421, 2018 |
5 |
Optimization of Time-Varying Electricity Rates Mays J, Klabjan D Energy Journal, 38(5), 67, 2017 |
6 |
A field study using an adaptive in-house pricing model for commercial and industrial customers in Korea Kim MJ Energy Policy, 102, 189, 2017 |
7 |
Critical peak electricity pricing for sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and case studies Wang Y, Li L Applied Energy, 175, 40, 2016 |
8 |
Variability of electricity load patterns and its effect on demand response: A critical peak pricing experiment on Korean commercial and industrial customers Jang D, Eom J, Park MJ, Rho JJ Energy Policy, 88, 11, 2016 |
9 |
Designing a critical peak pricing scheme for the profit maximization objective considering price responsiveness of customers Park SC, Jin YG, Song HY, Yoon YT Energy, 83, 521, 2015 |
10 |
Demand Impact of a Critical Peak Pricing Program: Opt-in and Opt-out Options, Green Attitudes and Other Customer Characteristics Fenrick SA, Getachew L, Ivanov C, Smith J Energy Journal, 35(3), 1, 2014 |