| 1 |
Dynamic risk analysis of hydrogen sulfide leakage for offshore natural gas wells in MPD phases
Wu SN, Zhang LB, Fan JC, Zhou YF
Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 122, 339, 2019 |
| 2 |
A Quantitative Individual Risk Assessment Method in Process Facilities with Toxic Gas Release Hazards: A Combined Scenario Set and CFD Approach
Zhang B, Liu Y, Qiao S
Process Safety Progress, 38(1), 52, 2019 |
| 3 |
Setting Multinational Risk Tolerance Criteria
Baybutt P
Process Safety Progress, 35(2), 153, 2016 |
| 4 |
Allocation of Individual Risk Criteria under LOPA Framework
Wang HQ, Shi WM, An YH
Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 48(8), 634, 2015 |
| 5 |
Risk analysis by means of a QRA approach on a LPG cylinder filling installation
Dormohammadi A, Zarei E, Delkhosh MB, Gholami A
Process Safety Progress, 33(1), 77, 2014 |
| 6 |
Application of a multi-plant QRA: A case study investigating the risk impact of the construction of a new plant on an existing chemical plant's risk levels
Baesi S, Abdolhamidzadeh B, Hassan CRC, Hamid MD, Reniers G
Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries, 26(5), 895, 2013 |
| 7 |
Safety distance analysis of dimethylether filling stations using a modified individual risk assessment method
Kim YH, So W, Shin D, Yoon ES
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 28(6), 1322, 2011 |
| 8 |
Quantitative risk assessment on a gaseous hydrogen refueling station in Shanghai
Li ZY, Pan XM, Ma JX
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(13), 6822, 2010 |
| 9 |
Quantitative Risk Assessment for the Transport of Ammonia by Rail
Hassan CRC, Puvaneswaran B, Aziz AR, Zalina MN, Hung FC, Sulaiman NM
Process Safety Progress, 29(1), 60, 2010 |
| 10 |
Choosing Appropriate Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria: Applications from the New CCPS Guidelines
Frank W, Jones D
Process Safety Progress, 29(4), 293, 2010 |
