| 초록 |
As demand for microfluid systems has increased recently and more complex designs are required than simple designs, traditional methods have limited microfluid production. Manufacturing of 2D microfluidic devices is also expensive and complex. However, 3D complements the shortcomings of existing technologies by simplifying processes and reducing production costs. Among the technologies in many 3D printers, Polyjet and DLP-SLAs were compared to optimize 3D printed microfluid production. Polyjet can be determined to affect the surface and resolution of printed samples using the modeling resin and the supporter resin. On the other hand, DLP-SLA had a smoother surface and resolution than Polyjet-type 3DP samples. This is because there is no rolling process without using support material. Results show that DLP-SLA 3D printers are better suited to Ployjet when more delicate and complex designs are needed, and can be applied to organizational engineering and cell engineering. |
